2016 Postmortem

edgineered

(2,101 posts)

31. He was searching for a vendor selling server wiping cloth.

Reply to Renew Deal (Original post)

Fri Dec 18, 2015, 01:42 PM

Dec 2015

A well known endorsement of the product was fairly recent.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

42 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

This is the part that got the Sanders campaign in trouble... [View all] Renew Deal Dec 2015 OP

Good move on the part of the DNC, whether he was trying to prove a point or not, doing so does not Thinkingabout Dec 2015 #1

It excuses his actions Renew Deal Dec 2015 #2

apparently then...its not all he did... VanillaRhapsody Dec 2015 #4

Exceptionally poor logic... n/t JonLeibowitz Dec 2015 #9

I think the logic is correct Renew Deal Dec 2015 #12

What? he went where he should not have gone. This is not going to get better as it goes on. Thinkingabout Dec 2015 #5

Why would I do that? VanillaRhapsody Dec 2015 #10

Exactly, why one can not control themselves when it comes to invading areas of others is beyond me. Thinkingabout Dec 2015 #18

Spoken like someone who has zero understanding of how this stuff even works. phleshdef Dec 2015 #13

Would you want your data stolen and look at for my own pleasure? Tell this to Sanders who fired Thinkingabout Dec 2015 #16

The data wasn't stolen. The vendor did a crummy development job in terms of exposing.... phleshdef Dec 2015 #17

Ethics, this should have been the rule, not that it can't be looked, the guy should have used Thinkingabout Dec 2015 #20

You aren't arguing about how it happened because you don't understand how it happened. phleshdef Dec 2015 #21

Don't attack me because this staff member is unethical, attach the person who did the deed. Sanders Thinkingabout Dec 2015 #25

There is zero proof that anything unethical occurred yet. phleshdef Dec 2015 #30

Go tell Sanders, he fired him. Thinkingabout Dec 2015 #36

Shirley Sherrod. Nuff said. phleshdef Dec 2015 #37

Tell Sanders he is wrong. Thinkingabout Dec 2015 #39

If I had all the facts in front of me and it seemed that was the case, hypothetically I would. phleshdef Dec 2015 #40

None of them do. Fawke Em Dec 2015 #32

Yea, same here. I've developed front end GUI, databases and all the tiers in between for 15 years. phleshdef Dec 2015 #38

and you just believe that hogwash... VanillaRhapsody Dec 2015 #3

Having 3 assistants help him ....... Historic NY Dec 2015 #6

The "peeking" is meaningless Renew Deal Dec 2015 #14

It isn't Sanders, it is his campaign staff, he should come out strong and say this, that he has Thinkingabout Dec 2015 #22

I don't think most voters care Renew Deal Dec 2015 #24

Then perhaps the repeated over and over posting is the over-reaction. If voters don't care Thinkingabout Dec 2015 #26

I agree Renew Deal Dec 2015 #27

Really you can bet your ass if it was a Clinton staffer Historic NY Dec 2015 #41

That's funny Renew Deal Dec 2015 #42

He meant no harm, had warned them of bugs previously but they kept cropping up so he was peacebird Dec 2015 #7

The simplest explanation is the most likely. Renew Deal Dec 2015 #15

The people that setup rights for data exposure wouldn't be members of either campaign. phleshdef Dec 2015 #19

I agree Renew Deal Dec 2015 #23

Okay, sorry, I may have misunderstood where you were going with that phleshdef Dec 2015 #28

Politics as usual paid for by a guy that fell on his sword poviding plausible deniability. Agnosticsherbet Dec 2015 #8

This message was self-deleted by its author VanillaRhapsody Dec 2015 #11

They did !! Leftyforever Dec 2015 #29

A person without integrity decided to steal information in order to give Sanders an advantage. Agnosticsherbet Dec 2015 #34

You sound like you know all the facts when you do not Leftyforever Dec 2015 #35

They did. Months ago. Nothing was done about it. eom Fawke Em Dec 2015 #33

He was searching for a vendor selling server wiping cloth. edgineered Dec 2015 #31