Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

SunSeeker

(56,924 posts)
3. What Johnson is doing is unconstitutional.
Wed Oct 8, 2025, 06:21 AM
Wednesday

As Grijalva’s fellow Arizona Democrat, Rep. Greg Stanton, told Johnson in a Sept. 30 letter, Johnson’s blocking of Grijalva’s swearing-in is “depriving more than 800,000 Arizonans of their rightful voice in Congress,” which Stanton said is “a direct violation of both the Constitution’s guarantee of representation and the House’s duty to respect the will of the voters.”

Also, in Powell v. McCormack (1969) 395 U.S. 486, the Supreme Court ruled that the House cannot refuse to seat a member-elect who meets constitutional requirements and whose election is certified. The official certified results from Grijalva's election will be available October 14. https://www.fox10phoenix.com/news/rep-elect-adelita-grijalva-not-yet-sworn-in-amid-government-shutdown

If Johnson does not certify her after October 14, she should sue Johnson to compel her swearing in, citing Powell v. McCormack .

First, words are cheap. no_hypocrisy Wednesday #1
IOKIYAR maxsolomon Wednesday #21
And the all-encompassing "NO FAIR REMEMBERING AT LEAST 10 MINUTES AGO" Montauk6 Wednesday #22
The basic attitude is try and stop us. maxsolomon Wednesday #23
And this so-called "Purple Revolution"... Montauk6 Wednesday #24
it's not how this shit is supposed to work Skittles Wednesday #2
What Johnson is doing is unconstitutional. SunSeeker Wednesday #3
"What Johnson is doing is unconstitutional." Grindr Mike doesn't care. Botany Wednesday #4
I don't understand why Arizona can't certify her election sooner BComplex Wednesday #12
Only the US House Speaker can swear in a new member SCantiGOP Wednesday #16
The Arizona Secretary of State is a Democrat, so I'm pretty sure if he could certify her sooner he would. SunSeeker Wednesday #19
He's a pathological liar The Wizard Wednesday #5
the house will never go back into session... Javaman Wednesday #6
Grindr Mike wolfie001 Wednesday #7
Little Mike's just trying to please his true Lord and Savior: donald fucking trump. (nt) Paladin Wednesday #8
They should get someone else to swear her in. nt Trueblue Texan Wednesday #9
Well we have 3 SCOTUS who can Historic NY Wednesday #13
I didn't know that. Maybe it is something we all need to make phone calls about Maraya1969 Wednesday #28
Fine. SHe wants. Now. DFW Wednesday #10
She can get a SCOTUS to swear her in Historic NY Wednesday #11
From the same people who changed the rules for Merrick Garland... Grins Wednesday #14
"Law & Order" is a TV show to the Repubs. nt Dulcinea Wednesday #18
This is exactly what they are going to do in January 2027 when they lose the house jgmiller Wednesday #15
Deny and delay... BattleRow Wednesday #20
Do your fucking job Johnson Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Wednesday #17
Why does swearing in matter? SpankMe Wednesday #25
It was a dumb stunt that gained them nothing. C_U_L8R Wednesday #26
personally keroro gunsou Wednesday #27
Can't stop wankin' around. calimary Wednesday #29
It should be made clear to the GQP leadership moniss Thursday #30
Latest Discussions»Editorials & Other Articles»Speaker Johnson said he'd...»Reply #3