Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

24601

(4,118 posts)
39. To clarify, it doesn't promote Grant to a 5-star general. It authorizes the President to promote
Fri Dec 9, 2022, 11:36 AM
Dec 2022

one rank higher, specific General of the Armies. The NDAA does address the number of stars.

The five-star General of the Army rank (and it's navy equivalent of Fleet Admiral) were WWII creations designed to provide equivalency with other nations' positions such as Field Marshal. Only Omar Bradley was promoted to General of the Army after WWII.

When General of the Army was established, General of the Armies John J. Pershing was still alive and the administration wanted it to be clear that the newly-created five-star rank would remain junior to Pershing - who never wore more than 4 stars. On at least one occasion, Pershing did wear 4 gold stars and this provided a difference from a General's 4 silver stars.

the NDAA permits promotion of Grant to the higher rank. If the President exercises the authority to promote Grant, he would join Pershing and Washington as the third officer holding the rank.



Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Collective stupidity. nt DURHAM D Dec 2022 #1
Fine. Let the Republicans refuse to fund our National Defense over some MAGA nonsense. Midnight Writer Dec 2022 #2
The House passed it. former9thward Dec 2022 #33
Ridiculous. The military requires multiple vaccines to insure... brush Dec 2022 #3
Ridiculous. Autumn Dec 2022 #4
I had heard on the radio early this morning BumRushDaShow Dec 2022 #5
the same antivax people at fox and in congress are vaccinated Marthe48 Dec 2022 #8
Yup BumRushDaShow Dec 2022 #10
So revoking the mandate at this point is moot; a symbolic gesture. Xipe Totec Dec 2022 #15
I think in this case BumRushDaShow Dec 2022 #19
You're right, as usual! COL Mustard Dec 2022 #25
The military has a healthy amount of turnover. former9thward Dec 2022 #34
This is so absurd. Force readiness at the mercy of idiots. Scalded Nun Dec 2022 #6
Yep! Rebl2 Dec 2022 #29
Heck of s precedent to set. Raven123 Dec 2022 #7
So, will the military members who were discharged SmittyWerben Dec 2022 #9
I think the bill includes letting them back -- with back pay no less! More MAGA deadly foolishness. PSPS Dec 2022 #32
Good way to rid the military of MAGA's. rickford66 Dec 2022 #11
Disappointed but not surprised - it makes no difference who is in office walkingman Dec 2022 #12
This! SledDriver Dec 2022 #18
Truth. Owl Dec 2022 #31
Yup. Magoo48 Dec 2022 #38
Interesting how an agenda can get attached to the defense budget... EarthFirst Dec 2022 #13
The only rules that matter to the GOP are the ones THEY write when they want to. Ford_Prefect Dec 2022 #14
There were some Democrats trying to get the John Lewis Voting Rights Act attached to this BumRushDaShow Dec 2022 #20
Agree - as you exit the majority why not get something for your concession? Maybe walkingman Dec 2022 #23
Fuck that shit mercuryblues Dec 2022 #16
Enlistment is way down except for the Marines. Peregrine Took Dec 2022 #17
The anti-vaxxers win this? WTF. Our military needs to be as disease resistent as we can get them. Evolve Dammit Dec 2022 #21
But the bill DOES do something important! James48 Dec 2022 #22
I am sure that item was worth the $858 Billion by itself. former9thward Dec 2022 #37
To clarify, it doesn't promote Grant to a 5-star general. It authorizes the President to promote 24601 Dec 2022 #39
Idiocracy Lives! Xoan Dec 2022 #24
As A Medical Professional... GB_RN Dec 2022 #26
+1 area51 Dec 2022 #35
I remember back when I was in boot camp, we were lined up for our shots, and one guy 70sEraVet Dec 2022 #27
Maybe he was real, maybe not. former9thward Dec 2022 #36
The very reason Curtis Dec 2022 #28
Exactly. Owl Dec 2022 #30
This view may be controversial Tom Rinaldo Dec 2022 #40
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»House passes massive $858...»Reply #39