House passes massive $858 billion defense bill that would scrap military Covid vaccine mandate ...
Source: CNBC
POLITICS
House passes massive $858 billion defense bill that would scrap military Covid vaccine mandate, teeing up Senate vote
PUBLISHED THU, DEC 8 2022 * 1:44 PM EST * UPDATED 14 MIN AGO
Christina Wilkie
@CHRISTINAWILKIE
https://twitter.com/christinawilkie
KEY POINTS
-- The House passed an $858 billion bill to fund the Defense Department, sending it to the Senate.
-- The measure includes a provision to scrap the Pentagons Covid vaccine mandate for active duty servicemembers.
-- Biden is expected to sign the legislation despite his support for the vaccine mandate.
WASHINGTON The U.S. House has passed a massive bill to fund the Defense Department for fiscal year 2023, teeing up a final vote in the Senate in the coming days that would send the $858 billion behemoth to President Joe Bidens desk, where he is expected to sign it.
The bill passed the Democratic-controlled House with a strong bipartisan majority, 350 in favor to 80 votes against it.
Among the more than 4,000 pages of legislation is a requirement that the Pentagon drop its Covid vaccine mandate for active duty servicemembers within 30 days of its enactment.
The mandate, originally put in place last year, recently emerged as a lightning rod for conservative Republicans, who threatened to sink the entire bill if it wasnt rescinded.
{snip}
Read more: https://www.cnbc.com/2022/12/08/house-passes-defense-bill-that-would-scrap-covid-vaccine-mandate.html
DURHAM D
(32,949 posts)Midnight Writer
(24,899 posts)That won't last long.
Strip the language from the Senate bill and send it back to the House. It's time to start calling the bluff of these wing-nuts. And if the GOP decides to "defund" our National Defense, make sure every American knows why.
former9thward
(33,424 posts)The House is under Democratic control.
brush
(61,033 posts)military readiness, but magats are faint of heart over covid vaccines? Pls let the Senate be the adults in the room and strip that ridiculousness from the bill.
Autumn
(48,499 posts)BumRushDaShow
(162,209 posts)that something like 99% of active duty personnel have been vaccinated. Per this, in addition to the active duty personnel, around 97% of DOD employees in general, have been vaccinated as well (I expect not counting qualified exemptions).
Marthe48
(22,130 posts)but they are working for russia, so undermining U.S. troops in any way assists putin.
BumRushDaShow
(162,209 posts)It's all "talking points" to appear to "own the libs" but then their naive flock becomes eligible to win the Herman Cain Award.
Xipe Totec
(44,414 posts)BumRushDaShow
(162,209 posts)that was probably a reason to going ahead with final passage of the Authorization (with the expectation that it will be signed by Biden into law - plus based on the House roll call tally, a veto could be over-ridden anyway and I expect the coming Senate tally would probably be the same type of veto-proof majority).
But there is absolutely nothing (other than needing to get the House control back after next year) stopping the Armed Services Committees in Congress from looking at clarifying vaccine mandates in the military and perhaps even codifying it better. So it's one of those things where they can say, "I'll come back and fight another day".
COL Mustard
(7,731 posts)I work in a fairly large organization in the Pentagon, and I'm not aware of anyone, military or civilian, who isn't vaccinated with at least the two doses plus at least one booster. (Personally, I'm fully vaxxed and fully boosted and will get whatever other boosters the FDA, NIH, CDC or EIEIO develop, as long as it'll keep me healthy.)
I want to make sure I point out that the vaccines and boosters are not ironclad, or armor against the vaccine. I've had everything in the regimen but I still contracted the virus last summer. My case was moderate but I didn't have to be hospitalized and contrary to what some of my office mates say, I'm not dead! I'm sure I contracted it at a family gathering last summer where most of the attendees were not vaxxed...and they won't get it now, since they've already had it. smdh
former9thward
(33,424 posts)It is not a static body.
Scalded Nun
(1,537 posts)What will they not want to comply with next...and will leadership cave...again?
Raven123
(7,207 posts)SmittyWerben
(829 posts)for refusing to get vaccinated be reinstated? Seems to me that that may be where this ends up.
PSPS
(15,054 posts)rickford66
(5,990 posts)walkingman
(10,006 posts)we worship our wars and needless military spending.
SledDriver
(2,122 posts)
War is a fucking racket, and the MIC/War Department budget smothers and starves the monumental goodness which could result from redirecting the national treasure we slather upon their bloody greed.
EarthFirst
(3,878 posts)Yet for the rail workers to get a contract; they had to present sick leave as a separate bill.
Ford_Prefect
(8,458 posts)BumRushDaShow
(162,209 posts)and that was waved away.
There was a period (I think after the Budget Control Act was passed) where they really couldn't add riders. But I noticed the past year or so, the earmarks and riders have made a comeback.
walkingman
(10,006 posts)there is more to the story? I suspect that it had to do with the threat of Ukraine funding going forward and I find that disgusting. It would have been really nice to get an agreement on VOTING RIGHTS.
I despise the GOP agenda and am expecting more drinking on my part as they take charge of the house.
mercuryblues
(15,935 posts)If a soldier can't get a shot to protect a fellow soldier, then I wouldn't trust them in a combat situation.
Conspiracy theorists have no place in the military.
Peregrine Took
(7,583 posts)I guess they don't want anything that might exclude a potential enlistee.
Evolve Dammit
(21,302 posts)The vaccines in question are safe and effective. I imagine many military personnel got Covid vaccines on their own time? I know I would have.
James48
(5,015 posts)It gives a promotion!
To General Ulysses S. Grant.
It gives him his Fifth General Officer Star-
Im not kidding.
Section 583.
I just wanted to make a note of something I found in the new National Defense Bill about to be voted on in Congress. It is 4,408 pages long.
You might want to note special provisions in section 583 of the bill.
Section 583 authorizes the PROMOTION of General Ulysses S. Grant S. US Army, to the rank of FIVE-Star General of the Army.
for real.
In the 2023 Unites States National Defense Appropriations Act (NDAA Defense Bill.)
Sec. 583. Posthumous appointment of Ulysses S. Grant to grade of General of the Armies of the United States.
https://rules.house.gov/sites/democrats.rules.house.gov/files/BILLS-117HR7776EAS-RCP117-70.pdf
Now, dont you feel better?
#Legislativenerd-I-read-the-bills
former9thward
(33,424 posts)Although if given a choice Grant would rather have a bottle of whiskey.
24601
(4,118 posts)one rank higher, specific General of the Armies. The NDAA does address the number of stars.
The five-star General of the Army rank (and it's navy equivalent of Fleet Admiral) were WWII creations designed to provide equivalency with other nations' positions such as Field Marshal. Only Omar Bradley was promoted to General of the Army after WWII.
When General of the Army was established, General of the Armies John J. Pershing was still alive and the administration wanted it to be clear that the newly-created five-star rank would remain junior to Pershing - who never wore more than 4 stars. On at least one occasion, Pershing did wear 4 gold stars and this provided a difference from a General's 4 silver stars.
the NDAA permits promotion of Grant to the higher rank. If the President exercises the authority to promote Grant, he would join Pershing and Washington as the third officer holding the rank.
Xoan
(25,570 posts)GB_RN
(3,450 posts)I'm an RN, I strenuously object to Congress doing this. Not only does it set a bad example for the public at large, but it puts the readiness of our military forces at risk. This is extremely short sighted and ignorant.
I'm not a medical professional, but the republinazis keep whining about how a "woke" military won't be ready; it's more likely that an unvaxxed military will be too sick to be ready.
70sEraVet
(5,028 posts)broke down in tears and made a scene about getting the shots.
They sent him home.
former9thward
(33,424 posts)People do all sorts of things to get out of boot. We had a couple people throw themselves down stairwells to get out.
Curtis
(349 posts)that we cannot afford nice things like free college, universal medical and dental, proper cost of living for those on Social Security, proper programs for the poor and homeless, etc.
$858,000,000,000.00
Tom Rinaldo
(23,172 posts)But to start off, to be clear, I support the vaccine mandate and think it is poor policy to remove it. Having said that, the importance of a decision by an individual not to be vaccinated is somewhat less important now than it previously was. Early variants of Covid-19 were far more likely to be stopped in their tracks upon encountering a vaccinated person, and therefor every person vaccinated became unlikely to pass the virus on. Covid has mutated to the point where vaccinations are becoming significantly less effective at preventing transmission. The current primary advantage of vaccination, and it of course is huge, is the effectiveness of the vaccine in sharply reducing negative consequences of a Covid infection among those vaccinated. That is a major advantage to the individual, and dramatically lessons pressure on our health system in general, but the days when we hoped that we could shut down Covid by achieving "herd immunity" via vaccinations are over, unless some much more effective vaccines emerge.