Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Top Twitter executives fired as Elon Musk takeover begins [View all]ificandream
(11,478 posts)65. Um, not so ....
"A Hard Day's Night" and "Yellow Submarine," two of The Beatles' films, are considered by critics today as outstanding.
Roger Ebert on "A Hard Day's Night":
"It was clear from the outset that "A Hard Day's Night" was in a different category from the rock musicals that had starred Elvis and his imitators. It was smart, it was irreverent, it didn't take itself seriously, and it was shot and edited by Richard Lester in an electrifying black-and-white, semi-documentary style that seemed to follow the boys during a day in their lives. And it was charged with the personalities of the Beatles, whose one-liners dismissed the very process of stardom they were undergoing."
And on "Yellow Submarine":
"The result, like "Fantasia," is a music-based animated film for the ages. The songs sound dramatically better, and the story avoids the usual gee-whiz urgency of so much animation and reflects the same deadpan understatement that the Beatles used in "A Hard Day's Night." Perhaps because the Beatles were considered such a draw, perhaps because the songs were counted on to sell the film, there was no agenda to dumb down the material or hard-sell the story. Instead of contrived urgency, there's unpressured whimsy, and the movie exists as pure charm, expressed in fantastical imagery. And then there are the songs."
Just sayin'. As George says in "A Hard Day's Night," ...
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
75 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations

Pretty typical during corporate takeovers, mergers, and acquisitions.
DetroitLegalBeagle
Oct 2022
#11
This is not unusual for these big time deals and those guys probably made a ton of money on the deal
Renew Deal
Oct 2022
#23
Seems unlikely. Twitter will continue to have a huge user base that will keep people tied to it
XorXor
Oct 2022
#68
Musk will still win even if he lets Trump back on Twitter and it tanks it because then Musk will
cstanleytech
Oct 2022
#44
So the "new and improved" Twitterverse is D.O.A. Musk has no clue at all how to actually improve it.
Ford_Prefect
Oct 2022
#51
No Democrat should ever buy a Tesla or any other product related to this power obsessed madman.
honest.abe
Oct 2022
#62
Blue sky is not an alternative to twitter! See: "the Musk - Dorsey connection"
SheltieLover
Oct 2022
#73
Saturday Night News: Musk fired the company's entire senior staff "for cause," an attempt to avoid
mahatmakanejeeves
Oct 2022
#71