Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)

In It to Win It

(12,663 posts)
Tue Nov 18, 2025, 05:25 PM Nov 2025

Trump's Justice Department may have accidentally handed Democrats five House seats - Ian Millhiser @ Vox [View all]

Vox - Gift Link

In a decision that could potentially reshape the 2026 midterm elections and cement the Democratic Party’s future control of the US House, a federal court just struck down the gerrymandered Texas maps that President Donald Trump pressured that state to enact. If the decision holds, it could cost Republicans as many as five House seats.

And that’s not all. The most remarkable thing about the three-judge panel’s decision in League of United Latin American Citizens (LULAC) v. Abbott is that it turns on an incompetent decision by Trump’s own administration.

As Judge Jeffrey Brown, a Trump appointee, explains in the court’s opinion, Texas lawmakers initially “didn’t have much appetite to redistrict on purely partisan grounds” — even as Trump urged them to do so. But Texas Republicans appear to have changed their mind after the Justice Department sent a letter last July to Texas’s top officials, which demanded that the state redraw several districts to change their racial makeup.

That letter, as I’ll explain in more detail below, misread a federal appeals court opinion to mean that the state was required to remake its maps. According to Judge Brown’s opinion, “it’s challenging to unpack the DOJ Letter because it contains so many factual, legal, and typographical errors.” He added that “even attorneys employed by the Texas Attorney General — who professes to be a political ally of the Trump Administration — describe the DOJ Letter as ‘legally[] unsound,’ ‘baseless,’ ‘erroneous,’ ‘ham-fisted,’ and ‘a mess.’”

Oops! Trump’s Justice Department may have accidentally handed Democrats five House seats

www.vox.com/politics/469...

Ian Millhiser (@imillhiser.bsky.social) 2025-11-18T21:15:01.580Z
35 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Let's hope so Jbraybarten Nov 2025 #1
Trump will raise hell with 'Pam' to find a way to overturn CA redistricting on same arguement Attilatheblond Nov 2025 #2
Oh, I'm sure SCOTUS will find a way to overturn this decision... regnaD kciN Nov 2025 #4
Sadly, I fear that entirely possible Attilatheblond Nov 2025 #5
Hellooooooo Shadow Docket n/t BaronChocula Nov 2025 #22
By my thinking, they don't need to find a way. bluestarone Nov 2025 #13
100 percent. There's literally no such thing as settled law in our legal system. BannonsLiver Nov 2025 #24
It's my understanding that the CA redistricting is strictly conditioned on that of TX. John Farmer Nov 2025 #8
Nah, not now that the people of CA have spoken. They're going through with this. Thanks, Texas. ancianita Nov 2025 #11
That's not what I'm reading. stopdiggin Nov 2025 #14
The Texas ruling does not affect California Prop. 50 LetMyPeopleVote Nov 2025 #19
What happens to California's Prop 50 maps if Texas redistricting efforts are blocked? LetMyPeopleVote Nov 2025 #17
I guess Texas forgot... COL Mustard Nov 2025 #28
We live on hope. efhmc Nov 2025 #34
Good malaise Nov 2025 #3
Marc Elias coming up after commercials on Nicole malaise Nov 2025 #6
Bless the Mark Elias Group! ancianita Nov 2025 #12
This ruling is going to affect a number of Texas races LetMyPeopleVote Nov 2025 #7
This means Jasmine Crockett can keep her district. ananda Nov 2025 #9
Yep malaise Nov 2025 #10
Well, no one ever said Donnie's DoJ was terribly bright. paleotn Nov 2025 #15
It's really scary how many total dimwits can get law degrees. (or MBAs,, etc.) erronis Nov 2025 #18
Just remember.... COL Mustard Nov 2025 #31
But how many politicians graduate below the 50% line in any field. Then went into politics. erronis Nov 2025 #32
As the old saying goes.... COL Mustard Nov 2025 #33
The school kids must have called him "Brissy" when he was growing up. nt Exp Nov 2025 #16
I hope California doesn't back down and they go forward with what they're gonna do until after the midterms oldmanlynn Nov 2025 #20
That is what I was going to ask, will this mean California may back off? I think they should stay Bev54 Nov 2025 #27
Good, they got what they deserve for trying to rig things. ChicagoTeamster Nov 2025 #21
The repukes think they are all so clever Javaman Nov 2025 #23
The meritocracy of super geniuses has a truly spectacular track record IronLionZion Nov 2025 #25
SCOTUS to the rescue. RandySF Nov 2025 #26
Yeah, if there's one thing the SC 6 can be relied on for, it's bending rules for Trump muriel_volestrangler Nov 2025 #30
Oopsie. TomSlick Nov 2025 #29
There is a crazed dissent to this ruling that is really strange LetMyPeopleVote Nov 2025 #35
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Trump's Justice Departmen...