Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)

Celerity

(52,679 posts)
Wed Oct 15, 2025, 01:51 PM Oct 15

Jack Smith Reveals He Had "Tons of Evidence" Against Trump [View all]



The former special counsel is speaking out against the Trump administration.

https://newrepublic.com/post/201788/jack-smith-evidence-trump

https://archive.ph/E5qUc



Former Justice Department special counsel Jack Smith—who has been tormented by MAGA for years over his dual criminal investigations into President Trump for illegal possession of classified documents and his role in January 6—is pulling out receipts.

“One of the major differences between the [Biden and Trump] cases is the obstructive conduct in the case that I investigated.… To prove illegal possession of classified documents, you need to show that the defendant possesses the documents willfully. That means [Trump] knew what he was doing was wrong,” Smith said in a sit-down interview at the University College London Centre for Global Constitutional Democracy, made available Tuesday. “We had tons of evidence of willfulness.”


The case Smith is referring to, in which Trump was charged with keeping classified documents in Mar-a-Lago after leaving the White House, resulted in a 40-felony-count indictment against the president in 2023. The case was eventually dropped after Trump won the election in 2024. “The government even tried to get them back before there was a criminal investigation, and then after the investigation started, [Trump] still [refused] to give them back, and then [tried] to obstruct the investigation,” Smith continued.

Even with this knowledge, it’s virtually impossible that Trump will receive any kind of consequence for these crimes, as he continues to harangue Smith—calling him a “sleazebag”—and anyone else who dared to investigate him, like New York Attorney General Letitia James and former FBI Director James Comey.

snip
44 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
I really don't know what to do with this. Baitball Blogger Oct 15 #1
America executed 2 people (the Rosenbergs) for doing exactly what Trump did with those stolen documents Botany Oct 15 #2
Ethel Rosenberg was innocent OutNow Oct 15 #26
Ethel was well aware of what her husband was doing Botany Oct 15 #27
I think Ethel's husband should have gotten life in prison only. Xolodno Oct 15 #28
if only this had been released prior to the most samsingh Oct 15 #3
We've handed the country over to criminals and fascists. hadEnuf Oct 15 #4
They had a long term plan. littlemissmartypants Oct 15 #7
Really hard to grasp what is happening here. bluestarone Oct 15 #5
IT WAS THE JUDGE WHO DELAYED THE PROCEEDINGS OVER AND OVER maxsolomon Thursday #41
Yea ty, i remember now, after the supreme court granted immunity, right? bluestarone Thursday #42
Is there s reason kacekwl Oct 15 #6
Yes. H2O Man Oct 15 #10
so garland held it back? nt Javaman Oct 15 #12
No. H2O Man Oct 15 #13
please elaborate. nt Javaman Oct 15 #14
Oh, sure. H2O Man Oct 15 #16
ahh okay, I thought it was. thanks! :) nt Javaman Oct 15 #17
garland was the ag rampartd Oct 15 #30
Perhaps you H2O Man Thursday #33
Which one of the Supremes? flamingdem Thursday #35
but he did not release the report, so "yes" rampartd Oct 15 #31
Wrong. H2O Man Thursday #32
Leaks are very popular kacekwl Oct 15 #29
They sure can be. H2O Man Thursday #34
Yeah, I know. I'm surprised there haven't been more of them of late. hamsterjill Thursday #44
A kick and a rec for you for providing the archive link. ... littlemissmartypants Oct 15 #8
kick Passages Oct 15 #9
Recommended. H2O Man Oct 15 #11
Well, SOMEBODY needs to be! calimary Oct 15 #21
Trump is a career criminal that commits Johonny Oct 15 #15
Halligan will probably indict Smith in the coming weeks. sop Oct 15 #18
Yup. Even with Halligan's lack of evidence, experience, credentials - just a failed beauty queen. erronis Oct 15 #20
and it will be a complete joke if so LymphocyteLover Thursday #37
It's all meaningless and probably destroyed now because he sat on it. live love laugh Oct 15 #19
He did prosecute maxsolomon Thursday #43
Jack Smith and Merrick Garland were failures. oldmanlynn Oct 15 #22
Patience, grasshopper. Garland's got this. Scrivener7 Oct 15 #23
What Smith should do.... 1. Keep it up Grins Oct 15 #24
No wonder Smith has not been indicted flamingdem Thursday #36
Makes me wonder... WestMichRad Oct 15 #25
Everyone paying attention knew Dump was guilty as fuck in this documents case. LymphocyteLover Thursday #38
Well hold on to it, just in case Abstractartist Thursday #39
Evidence gfarber Thursday #40
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Jack Smith Reveals He Had...