Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

In reply to the discussion: Re: James Comey [View all]

yellow dahlia

(3,480 posts)
10. Thanks for the well thought out analysis.
Thu Oct 9, 2025, 03:17 PM
Thursday

I agree with you - there were a lot of variables at play in 2016. I posit that Comey may have been manipulated by some of those variables.

Does Comey have different biases than me? Perhaps. Do I find some of his personality traits annoying? Perhaps. But that does not mean I should paint him as an evil bad guy and blame him for what happened in 2016? I don't think so. He is human, like all of us.

I have opinions about the behavior of Wasserman-Schulz and the DNC, as well.

I applaud your research. Here is more about the forces at work behind the scenes in the 2016 election. Charles McGonigle, at the FBI New York field office, may have played a very significant role in helping to sway the election. He was working with Rudy Giuliani, He had connections to the Russians in the background. It is likely that Comey spoke up at one point because he knew a leak from the NY field office was forthcoming. It is possible McConigle was behind the leak to NY Times, which led to an erroneous front page spread on Oct. 31, citing unnamed “intelligence sources,” the Times reported, “Investigating Donald Trump, F.B.I. Sees No Clear Link to Russia.”

In October of 2023, the Philadelphia Inquirer published an article, written by Will Bunch, entitled: "The NYT should tell readers whether it helped crooked FBI agents get Trump elected in 2016". The subtitle of the article was "[T]he arrest of a high-level FBI agent on Russia-tied corruption charges raises stunning new questions about how Trump really won in 2016".

The first paragraph reads: "It was arguably the most consequential “October Surprise” in the history of American presidential elections. In the waning days of the 2016 race, with polls showing Hillary Clinton clinging to a lead over Donald Trump, two last-minute stories broke that rekindled on-the-fence voters’ ethical doubts about Democrat Clinton and quashed a budding scandal around her GOP rival." Here is an archived link to the full article. https://archive.ph/uTMbc

There were a lot of forces at play in the 2016 election.

Recommendations

3 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Re: James Comey [View all] H2O Man Thursday OP
I too am equivocal about Comey. But, I am convinced if ANYONE CAN defend against & expose Trump's vendetta-only hlthe2b Thursday #1
Thank you! H2O Man Thursday #5
Agree 100% malaise Thursday #6
Agreed. Right now he is on Team Rule of Law. yellow dahlia Thursday #11
The Republican Party always has an October surprise. PurgedVoter Thursday #2
I agree. H2O Man Thursday #7
Thanks for that. yellow dahlia Thursday #15
Thank you thank you thank you Nictuku Thursday #3
Right. H2O Man Thursday #8
It is very similar with those against Garland, minds are made up regardless of facts. Bev54 Thursday #12
Absolutely! H2O Man Thursday #20
I still think... Chemical Bill Thursday #4
Exactly! H2O Man Thursday #9
Thanks for the well thought out analysis. yellow dahlia Thursday #10
Thank you. H2O Man Thursday #17
Early in 2017 canetoad Thursday #13
I found this. yellow dahlia Thursday #16
Not the same article canetoad Thursday #23
Ah. Thanks. yellow dahlia Thursday #24
Yes, I remember. H2O Man Thursday #19
Correction: Comey OVERRULED the black woman that was his superior. W_HAMILTON Thursday #14
Wrong. H2O Man Thursday #18
NOT wrong -- and I have the receipts. W_HAMILTON Thursday #21
Because I like and respect you, H2O Man Thursday #22
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Re: James Comey»Reply #10