Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

kerouac2

(1,324 posts)

11. Only awful people with awful plans need that

Reply to erronis (Original post)

Sat Oct 4, 2025, 01:57 PM

Oct 4

If you aren't bat$hit crazy, criminal and evil, you wouldn't need to do this.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

3 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Batshit_Bruin_CA oberle Bernardo de La Paz

35 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Trump Used AI to Scan U.S. Generals' Faces for Loyalty -- and to Root Out Whistleblowers -- Lev Parnas [View all] erronis Oct 4 OP

Who was running it? Laura Loomer? johnnyfins Oct 4 #1

Fat Lips Laura? Makes sense. erronis Oct 4 #7

We can't even get lie detectors that can do that reliably. LostOne4Ever Oct 4 #2

That's never stopped them. Hugin Oct 4 #3

They're not interested in accuracy unblock Oct 4 #4

This debsy Oct 4 #18

It's not hard to convince Trump and his minions that AI can do anything. enough Oct 4 #5

Especially since Melania is in charge of AI. vanlassie Oct 4 #24

I wonder what AI tells him when he scans Melania. tetedur Oct 4 #26

It's been in use for awhile TommyT139 Oct 4 #12

accuracy Kali Oct 4 #20

Well... 2naSalit Oct 4 #6

That technology capability is absolute fucking horseshit. The tech ain't worth a squirt o' cat piss. SoFlaBro Oct 4 #8

It doesn't have to be 100% reliable for it to be used (and abused). WestMichRad Oct 4 #19

That sounds like a conspiracy theory to me. If it is true - that is indeed scary. walkingman Oct 4 #9

This is is the realm of "lots of people are telling me" at this point. Ms. Toad Oct 4 #10

I don't disagree with your sentiments. Thought it interesting and not outside of their fevered desires. erronis Oct 4 #14

Only awful people with awful plans need that kerouac2 Oct 4 #11

Lev Parnas? dwayneb Oct 4 #13

A little coffee and I'd fidget enough. How about some CBD ? Take the chill off. Tetrachloride Oct 4 #15

Let's please not turn this place into another QAnon. LudwigPastorius Oct 4 #16

Well said. Gimpyknee Oct 4 #25

Holy shit. Beartracks Oct 4 #17

If this AI is as brilliant and reliable as all the others, we might be in trouble... naaaah. n/t TygrBright Oct 4 #21

It doesn't have to be brilliant & reliable for it to be used for this purpose and for it to be trouble. . . . . nt Bernardo de La Paz Oct 4 #23

Does anyone doubt that the Yarvinist tech loons-- not fooled Oct 4 #22

JHFC orangecrush Oct 4 #27

Trump can't even spell AI. n/t flvegan Oct 4 #28

Real LEADERS BOSSHOG Oct 4 #29

Definitely a smell of bullshit here. Girard442 Oct 4 #30

AI Loyalty Test gfarber Oct 4 #31

Of Course Neo Nazis Did. What the Hell Cha Oct 4 #32

This is the first plausible explanation for that meeting intrepidity Oct 4 #33

I wondered about the Euphoria Oct 4 #34

Real or not, it still could instill much of what they hope to accomplish, fear and compliance. Bumbles Sunday #35