Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

UTUSN

(75,612 posts)

3. The (Fundie?) rationale fills in the blank. Throughout the impeachment trial

Reply to surfered (Original post)

Thu Jul 10, 2025, 11:07 PM

Jul 10

she was on the senate floor, excused or recused from voting as a State senator, but present hearing all the testimony about his affair. She showed no emotion and by herself with everybody keeping awkwardly "respectfully" away. No detectable emotion. While the painful embarrassment might be obvious speculation, there appeared to be no clue about why she was standing by him. "Respectful" silence from the media, no interviews of course.

So her (Fundie?) component in the divorce statement fills in that blank, along with the predictable self-delusion.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

3 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

A synopsis of Paxton's marital, legal and political problems [View all] surfered Jul 10 OP

Proving that he is another republicon family-values role model BoRaGard Jul 10 #1

"Paxton and his wife announce their divorce on biblical grounds." 70sEraVet Jul 10 #2

The (Fundie?) rationale fills in the blank. Throughout the impeachment trial UTUSN Jul 10 #3