Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

harumph

(2,700 posts)

1. Yes, this was a preposterous exercise.

Reply to marble falls (Original post)

Sat May 17, 2025, 01:40 PM

Yesterday

For reasons too numerous to describe. An AI simulation of a victim's statement - presented in court. I don't understand how this won't lead to a possible challenge. Does this introduce the concept that AI can serve as a proxy or agent (...posthumously!!)? This serves to fuel my misanthropic fantasies of moving to a very remote place and watching this country burn from afar.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

5 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

flamingdem Bettie BeerBarrelPolka quaint LAS14

9 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

We are spiraling down the hole Dept: Murder victim 'speaks' beyond the grave in AI generated video at sentencing [View all] marble falls Yesterday OP

Yes, this was a preposterous exercise. harumph Yesterday #1

The right to confront witnesses is the heart of the 6th Amendment Ponietz Yesterday #2

This will be appealed - Ms. Toad Yesterday #3

An interesting event indeed .... anciano Yesterday #4

That's fucked up. Solly Mack Yesterday #5

A scripted, ARTIFICIAL, third-party created artifact isn't de-facto hearsay? dickthegrouch Yesterday #6

If it isn't actual video of the victim, I don't think it should be used. nt Ilsa Yesterday #7

Crazy... Meowmee Yesterday #8

Weird Black Mirror stuff. Tommy Carcetti Yesterday #9