Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: UN Human Rights Council: "Israel is responsible for war crimes/crimes against humanity..." [View all]sarisataka
(22,070 posts)3. UNHRC? Did they actually say "Israel"
they have difficulty acknowledging Israel has the right to exist.
The UNHRC has a standing agenda item for every meeting:
Item 7. Human rights situation in Palestine and other occupied Arab territories
-Human rights violations and implications of the Israeli occupation of Palestine and other occupied Arab territories
-Right to self-determination of the Palestinian people
The special rapporteur on the question of Palestine to the previous UNCHR, the current UNHRC and the General Assembly was, between 2001 and 2008, John Dugard. Bayefski quotes him as saying that his mandate is to "investigate human rights violations by Israel, not by Palestinians"
Speaking at the IDC's Herzliya Conference in Israel in January 2008, Dutch Foreign Minister Maxime Verhagen criticized the actions of the Human Rights Council actions against Israel. "At the United Nations, censuring Israel has become something of a habit, while Hamas's terror is referred to in coded language or not at all. The Netherlands believes the record should be set straight, both in New York and at the Human Rights Council in Geneva", Verhagen said.
At UNHRC's opening session in February 2011, U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton criticized the council's "structural bias" against the State of Israel: "The structural bias against Israel including a standing agenda item for Israel, whereas all other countries are treated under a common item is wrong. And it undermines the important work we are trying to do together."[
The United States urged UNHRC in Geneva to stop its anti-Israel bias. It took particular exception to the council's Agenda Item 7, under which at every session, Israel's human rights record is debated. No other country has a dedicated agenda item. The US Ambassador to UNHRC Eileen Chamberlain Donahoe said that the United States was deeply troubled by the "Council's biased and disproportionate focus on Israel." She said that the hypocrisy was further exposed in the Golan Heights resolution that was advocated by the Syrian regime at a time when it was murdering its own citizens.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Nations_Human_Rights_Council#Accusations_of_bias_against_Israel
I don't think the UNHRC has much credibility regarding the I/P conflict.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
9 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
36 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
UN Human Rights Council: "Israel is responsible for war crimes/crimes against humanity..." [View all]
TomDaisy
Jun 2024
OP
lol, what a useless body. This is a "human rights" council that includes Russia, China, Saudi Arabia, Sudan among other
tritsofme
Jun 2024
#2
What combination of letters would be most credible in condemnation of Bibi? tia
uponit7771
Jun 2024
#6
Statement on Antisemitic Remarks by a Commissioner of the UN Human Rights Council's Commission of Inquiry
lapucelle
Jun 2024
#7
Nope, some have just been good old fashioned protesting of Jews in public settings too
Mountainguy
Jun 2024
#19
Except that US kids are not protesting en masse against the HAMAs/Israeli war,
MarineCombatEngineer
Jun 2024
#9
The MSM likes to play up to these elitist kids by proclaiming that this is mainstream and that these
MarineCombatEngineer
Jun 2024
#15