Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Scrivener7

(57,487 posts)

6. There are a lot of posts on why that won't happen in this thread, but the fact

Reply to Beachnutt (Original post)

Wed May 24, 2023, 09:31 AM

May 2023

is, we just don't know.

I don't THINK he'll do that. He doesn't seem the type. But Garland has to approve everything that goes out from Smith's investigation, so who knows?

We can only wait and see.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

20 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

What if Jack Smith reports like Robert Muller did [View all] Beachnutt May 2023 OP

Pointless speculation relayerbob May 2023 #1

So you're sure Jack will report a recommendation for indictment unredacted ? Beachnutt May 2023 #3

Mueller laid out the evidence to indict Trump, gab13by13 May 2023 #9

The report was released March 22, 2019. Bill Barr was the AG then, not Garland. herding cats May 2023 #12

Then why blame Mueller? gab13by13 May 2023 #13

Math has always been the weakest point of that crowd AZSkiffyGeek May 2023 #14

Barr had his whitewashed rewrite ready for the press, even before Mueller was done FakeNoose May 2023 #17

Seriously, quit drinking Kool-aid relayerbob May 2023 #19

Smith is not a republican whose wife's best friend is the wife of Bill Barr Walleye May 2023 #2

They have different roles Johnny2X2X May 2023 #4

Mueller bagged 40 crooks, including Manafort viva la May 2023 #5

And then Trump went and pardoned/commuted Mad_Machine76 May 2023 #15

There are a lot of posts on why that won't happen in this thread, but the fact Scrivener7 May 2023 #6

nonsense, Jack Smith GenXer47 May 2023 #7

I don't see Merrick Garland running interference for Trump agingdem May 2023 #8

See the E. Jean Carroll original lawsuit gab13by13 May 2023 #10

Because sexual assault falls under the duties of POTUS if your pisswig. onecaliberal May 2023 #11

This raises the questions H2O Man May 2023 #16

Have great day.... Beachnutt May 2023 #18

Unlikely ...... H2O Man May 2023 #20