Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: As I understand it, here's a very simplistic explanation of what happened with Silicon Valley Bank. [View all]roamer65
(37,806 posts)64. Hard to sell bonds when the Federal Reserve is constricting M1 money supply.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
78 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
As I understand it, here's a very simplistic explanation of what happened with Silicon Valley Bank. [View all]
LuckyCharms
Mar 2023
OP
I choose to focus on the entire collection of legislators who passed this law
Fiendish Thingy
Mar 2023
#12
Lemme guess: Banks must have paid high-priced LOBBYISTS to promise campaign donations
Justice matters.
Mar 2023
#16
You can assume my contempt for the anti-worker, fascist republicans as a given.
Fiendish Thingy
Mar 2023
#46
I don't know about the FED, but I think Thiel would definitely try to harm Biden politically.
Lonestarblue
Mar 2023
#9
Yep...you got it...when Fed began to raise rates...the bank got squeezed as the bonds lost market values...
ashredux
Mar 2023
#6
+1, but the bank ... KNEW ... the feds were going to increase rates and held that dumb position
uponit7771
Mar 2023
#52
Nope.... It was not the federal reserves fault. The bank management did not do their job.
ashredux
Mar 2023
#26
I think you are missing the big picture. While a single bank can suffer from bad decisions,
flashman13
Mar 2023
#48
"because the balance sheets of many other institutions look the same as SVB." SVB held on to bonds
uponit7771
Mar 2023
#53
What happened w/this? Do all these partners have exposure to this collapse at the Wall Street
Backseat Driver
Mar 2023
#18
Researching stuff too, I also came across this Goldman-Sak "Marcus" easy to start high-yield
Backseat Driver
Mar 2023
#31
Thanks for this great information. Knowledge is good, even if you have no $$$. n/t
Paper Roses
Mar 2023
#19
This point, not enough data to make that determination. But crypto might be in the mix.
ashredux
Mar 2023
#38
Disagree, SVB should've known their bonds were going to lose at minimum short term value and ...
uponit7771
Mar 2023
#54
Well, I recall 2008, and some awfully big, big boys failed.... You had to keep certain regulations in
ashredux
Mar 2023
#39
YEP!! "SBV over-weighted the amount of depositor's funds that were used to buy [FED BONDs]"
uponit7771
Mar 2023
#51
I am wondering if they were also involved in the Bitcoin debacle.....
William Gustafson
Mar 2023
#65