Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

brooklynite

(96,882 posts)

7. I'm not aware that DHS has expressed a concern.

Reply to ificandream (Reply #5)

Wed Feb 22, 2023, 03:22 PM

Feb 2023

And the second point, while politically biased, isn't illegal.

Presumably the Senate Democrats could release the same video to a media outlet of their choice.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

18 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Will someone go to court to stop Tucker Carlson's J6 footage marathon? [View all] ificandream Feb 2023 OP

I certainly hope so claudette Feb 2023 #1

What is the legal basis for blocking release of the footage? brooklynite Feb 2023 #2

I'm no lawyer but ... ificandream Feb 2023 #5

I'm not aware that DHS has expressed a concern. brooklynite Feb 2023 #7

Prior restraint. Not going to happen onenote Feb 2023 #13

I'm surprised that reputable news organizations... WestMichRad Feb 2023 #3

Can't be stopped gab13by13 Feb 2023 #4

What would you call what McCarthy did? Partisan in the worst way. ificandream Feb 2023 #6

This message was self-deleted by its author Chin music Feb 2023 #8

Fox news will edit in Antifas.... Chakaconcarne Feb 2023 #9

How Was McCarthy Able To Hand Those Tapes Over?..... global1 Feb 2023 #10

This message was self-deleted by its author Chin music Feb 2023 #11

Were the tapes marked as Classified? forthemiddle Feb 2023 #14

This message was self-deleted by its author Chin music Feb 2023 #15

I recommend that you read up on the Pentagon Papers case onenote Feb 2023 #12

I can't think of any basis to do so FBaggins Feb 2023 #16

More likely, there is about to be a deluge of FOI requests GoCubsGo Feb 2023 #17

Are you all saying that you are not happy that Fox can review all of those long hours of tape Chainfire Feb 2023 #18