Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

ificandream

(11,446 posts)
Wed Feb 22, 2023, 03:09 PM Feb 2023

Will someone go to court to stop Tucker Carlson's J6 footage marathon?

I'm surprised there hasn't been a court order yet to stop what McCarthy has handed over to Tuckweed Carlson. Is this going to go unfettered? Certainly, McCarthy had no right to do this. Is this not corruption at the highest level?

I really hope some lawyer out there (maybe one reading here) will soon make a court motion or lawsuit to stop this. The danger of what McCarthy has done is beyond belief.

18 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Will someone go to court to stop Tucker Carlson's J6 footage marathon? (Original Post) ificandream Feb 2023 OP
I certainly hope so claudette Feb 2023 #1
What is the legal basis for blocking release of the footage? brooklynite Feb 2023 #2
I'm no lawyer but ... ificandream Feb 2023 #5
I'm not aware that DHS has expressed a concern. brooklynite Feb 2023 #7
Prior restraint. Not going to happen onenote Feb 2023 #13
I'm surprised that reputable news organizations... WestMichRad Feb 2023 #3
Can't be stopped gab13by13 Feb 2023 #4
What would you call what McCarthy did? Partisan in the worst way. ificandream Feb 2023 #6
This message was self-deleted by its author Chin music Feb 2023 #8
Fox news will edit in Antifas.... Chakaconcarne Feb 2023 #9
How Was McCarthy Able To Hand Those Tapes Over?..... global1 Feb 2023 #10
This message was self-deleted by its author Chin music Feb 2023 #11
Were the tapes marked as Classified? forthemiddle Feb 2023 #14
This message was self-deleted by its author Chin music Feb 2023 #15
I recommend that you read up on the Pentagon Papers case onenote Feb 2023 #12
I can't think of any basis to do so FBaggins Feb 2023 #16
More likely, there is about to be a deluge of FOI requests GoCubsGo Feb 2023 #17
Are you all saying that you are not happy that Fox can review all of those long hours of tape Chainfire Feb 2023 #18
 

claudette

(5,455 posts)
1. I certainly hope so
Wed Feb 22, 2023, 03:14 PM
Feb 2023

I heard some pundit on TV say that other media outlets can try to get the tapes through the Freedom of Information Act.

ificandream

(11,446 posts)
5. I'm no lawyer but ...
Wed Feb 22, 2023, 03:20 PM
Feb 2023

... security has been mentioned many times in all the news stories. There's also the fact that no news outlets were offered them. (Fox doesn't count.)

 

brooklynite

(96,882 posts)
7. I'm not aware that DHS has expressed a concern.
Wed Feb 22, 2023, 03:22 PM
Feb 2023

And the second point, while politically biased, isn't illegal.

Presumably the Senate Democrats could release the same video to a media outlet of their choice.

onenote

(45,721 posts)
13. Prior restraint. Not going to happen
Wed Feb 22, 2023, 04:33 PM
Feb 2023

The Pentagon Papers case seems to be the latest first amendment ruling applauded by progressives that some DUers now are willing to throw under the bus.

WestMichRad

(2,703 posts)
3. I'm surprised that reputable news organizations...
Wed Feb 22, 2023, 03:19 PM
Feb 2023

… haven’t filed suit to gain equal access to the information.

ificandream

(11,446 posts)
6. What would you call what McCarthy did? Partisan in the worst way.
Wed Feb 22, 2023, 03:21 PM
Feb 2023

He really is a slimeball.

Response to ificandream (Original post)

global1

(26,244 posts)
10. How Was McCarthy Able To Hand Those Tapes Over?.....
Wed Feb 22, 2023, 03:55 PM
Feb 2023

What authorization does he have to do so?

One would think that those tapes would be property of the National Archives and be made available to any news organization that would want to view them.

If they were capture by camera's in and around the Capitol Bldg - I would assume that us taxpayers paid for them and that they shouldn't be turned over to any ONE organization - but to be shared across all.

Response to global1 (Reply #10)

forthemiddle

(1,455 posts)
14. Were the tapes marked as Classified?
Wed Feb 22, 2023, 05:14 PM
Feb 2023

If not, I see no reason they can’t be released.
It’s up to other Networks to request them.

Response to forthemiddle (Reply #14)

FBaggins

(28,469 posts)
16. I can't think of any basis to do so
Wed Feb 22, 2023, 05:46 PM
Feb 2023
Certainly, McCarthy had no right to do this.

Why? They were under Pelosi's control when she was Speaker. Now he is.

And, of course, he could have had the entire House vote on it if he needed to.

GoCubsGo

(34,435 posts)
17. More likely, there is about to be a deluge of FOI requests
Wed Feb 22, 2023, 05:51 PM
Feb 2023

from all of the other media organizations. This ain't going to end well for Kevvy, and hopefully not Cucker, either.

 

Chainfire

(17,757 posts)
18. Are you all saying that you are not happy that Fox can review all of those long hours of tape
Wed Feb 22, 2023, 05:58 PM
Feb 2023

and then tell us what was on them? Where is trust in the fourth estate?

I do not know how Mc can release them exclusively to Fox. I guess we will see.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Will someone go to court ...