Just a guess.Trumps recent tirade against Smith may be a sign he knows the hammer may come down soon

[Beastly Boy]

40. At your request, I read Paragraph 3 again. Carefully.

Last edited Sat Jan 14, 2023, 08:11 PM - Edit history (1)

I still fail to see any evidence of "things" being swept under the rug in the current investigation. Or, consequently, how the current investigation parallels in any way the past events cited in Paragraph 3.

You asked: "Does the clear history and pattern of corrupt republicons getting away with it make you angry?" Yes, it does. But that, notwithstanding your false interpretation of Paragraph 3, was not the question which was asked of me. If you reread Paragraph 3 in its entirety without parsing it into parts you care to address and leaving out the parts you don't, it does not ask me whether "the clear history and pattern of corrupt republicons getting away with it" makes me angry". The paragraph outlines what makes the author of the post angry, namely "fear those things (unaddressed by current investigation -BB) will eventually get swept under the rug". It then cites, without forming a question, the reasons his anger appears justified, and asks me whether the same thing makes me angry as well.

At the risk of repeating myself: No, the fear of things being swept under the rug in the course of multiple ongoing investigations of Trump's criminality doesn't anger me. I consider such fear, given the current state of affairs, irrational.

However, if you still want the answer to YOUR question, "Does the clear history and pattern of corrupt republicons getting away with it make you angry?", the answer is yes, yes it does. And your point is...what exactly?