Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BumRushDaShow

(161,782 posts)
22. We never had 2/3rds of a majority in the House
Sat Jan 7, 2023, 05:47 PM
Jan 2023

(that would require 290) and without that, you would not be able to expel. What usually happens in the situation where criminal activities have been charged and/or resulted in convictions, the Rep. would resign.

The "participate" part would need to be shown beyond just voting for an "objection" to a state's certification, which was allowable through the law that was JUST changed thanks to including the text of the Electoral Count Reform Act in the last Omnibus Appropriations for FY23.

If they can nail down some of the circumstantial stuff like Boebert's communications of the location of the Speaker, but more so, since DOJ has Scott Perry's phone data, and they can definitively establish his firm involvement (and I think it's a foregone conclusion that he was involved in the planning/participation of the insurrection), that would be one to do right away.

Republican congressman says FBI seized his cell phone

By Sara Murray, Zachary Cohen, Katelyn Polantz and Whitney Wild, CNN
Updated 10:11 PM EDT, Wed August 10, 2022


CNN — Republican Rep. Scott Perry of Pennsylvania said Tuesday that the FBI had seized his cell phone. “This morning, while traveling with my family, 3 FBI agents visited me and seized my cell phone,” he said in part in a statement.

The search is connected to an investigation being conducted in part by the Justice Department inspector general, according to a personal familiar with the matter. While Perry has not said why his phone was seized, the watchdog also is investigating the actions of former Justice Department official Jeffrey Clark, and potentially others, as it examines the department’s role in seeking to assist former President Donald Trump to block certification of the 2020 election results.

Spokespeople for the Justice Department and its inspector general both declined to comment.

Perry is closely linked to Clark, who has come under scrutiny by federal investigators for his role in efforts to overturn the 2020 election and had his home searched by law enforcement officials earlier this summer.

(snip)

https://www.cnn.com/2022/08/09/politics/scott-perry-fbi-seize-cellphone/index.html


Apparently they went after Perry in an attempt to get Clark but I expect they may now have some interesting stuff on him. The phone was imaged and then handed back to him. He sued to get his data back, but then 2 months later, abruptly withdrew the suit.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

IOKIYAR Eliot Rosewater Jan 2023 #1
If you gotta go, you gotta go chicoescuela Jan 2023 #2
Statute of limitations might save him. DemocratSinceBirth Jan 2023 #3
Do they have statute of limitations in Brazil? LiberalFighter Jan 2023 #8
The court suspended statute of limitations in 2013, when they couldn't find him. Eugene Jan 2023 #20
Are newly minted congress critters issued diplomatic passports? Brother Buzz Jan 2023 #4
See ya, Santos. And please don't come back. Blue Owl Jan 2023 #5
nothing republianmushroom Jan 2023 #6
Has he even been sworn in yet? Buckeyeblue Jan 2023 #7
They were all sworn in about 1:30 am ET this morning. BumRushDaShow Jan 2023 #9
Are Democrats going to file a lawsuit over the swearing in of the insurectionists? Buckeyeblue Jan 2023 #11
Well I expect that provision only applies BumRushDaShow Jan 2023 #13
I just read it and it doesn't say anything about conviction Buckeyeblue Jan 2023 #21
We never had 2/3rds of a majority in the House BumRushDaShow Jan 2023 #22
I agree that we don't have the votes. And even with a conviction I'm not sure we would Buckeyeblue Jan 2023 #24
Well in Santos' case BumRushDaShow Jan 2023 #25
And that very vaguness in the Amendment Genki Hikari Jan 2023 #27
They were sworn in two years ago, so no Polybius Jan 2023 #15
Yes, he's officially sworn in Brother Buzz Jan 2023 #10
We have an extradition treaty with Brazil... Ohio Joe Jan 2023 #12
Byeeee Hekate Jan 2023 #14
Unlikely. maxsolomon Jan 2023 #16
Brazil has a long statute of limitations Genki Hikari Jan 2023 #28
I won't be displeased. maxsolomon Jan 2023 #30
Brazil is looking into it IbogaProject Jan 2023 #17
A Go-Fund-Me campaign to cover his air fare Zambero Jan 2023 #18
Let's cooperate RainCaster Jan 2023 #19
Well, bye... Wounded Bear Jan 2023 #23
We pick up a seat Stinky The Clown Jan 2023 #26
Send him back. GoodRaisin Jan 2023 #29
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»What happens if Brazil wa...»Reply #22