General Discussion

tosh

(4,453 posts)

30. Why do we not DEMAND...

Wed Jul 20, 2022, 01:53 PM

Jul 2022

that weapons developed for, and contracted FOR PURCHASE BY, our military, can NOT BE SOLD or COPIED FOR SALE TO the public???

How is it that they can get these Hyde amendment things going to prohibit OUR taxpayer dollars from aiding Women’s healthcare? We need similar for military arms!

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

77 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

'Proud' Gunmaker Figures Out How to Make Massacres Worse [View all] Jilly_in_VA Jul 2022 OP

So to all the former police who now own gun shops. And are all thoughts and prayers Srkdqltr Jul 2022 #1

And at a cost of 8k each I am sure lots will buy it. thatdemguy Jul 2022 #2

cool story Xoan Jul 2022 #7

That's not what the OP says. brush Jul 2022 #8

The manufacturer is the one saying it is more powerful Grolph_ Jul 2022 #77

TBF, body armor worn by police sarisataka Jul 2022 #3

$8,000? underpants Jul 2022 #4

Long-range snipers going to replace mass shootings as the new normal? KS Toronado Jul 2022 #9

Guns suck. LokiandMala Jul 2022 #19

Could be the form the promised civil war takes HAB911 Jul 2022 #13

Good point duckworth969 Jul 2022 #18

The few RWNJs I have talked to the last few years HAB911 Jul 2022 #20

Aimed straight at the average gunner . . . AndyS Jul 2022 #5

Sig's civilian version of its new military rifle, chambered in .308, 6.5 Creedmore and .277 Fury, sop Jul 2022 #6

it does me Locrian Jul 2022 #12

fucking disgusting CatWoman Jul 2022 #10

This round was developed for the military. Straw Man Jul 2022 #11

There are a lot of weapons developed for military use that are now used by LEO and criminals ZonkerHarris Jul 2022 #40

It just keeps getting more insane. patphil Jul 2022 #14

I'm not seeing what is new or unique about this Amishman Jul 2022 #15

Nothing new or unique Zeitghost Jul 2022 #59

The only think unique about it ... Straw Man Jul 2022 #68

This country has a streak of sheer insanity Hekate Jul 2022 #16

That's the price of freedom IronLionZion Jul 2022 #17

Freedom for people with the guns. hadEnuf Jul 2022 #41

Innocent people have to pay the price IronLionZion Jul 2022 #53

Assault weapons are ok but abortions are bad? Timeflyer Jul 2022 #21

Good point Evolve Dammit Jul 2022 #31

+1, uponit7771 Jul 2022 #71

Might as well know the enemy and his equipment. ancianita Jul 2022 #22

Good to know, but these mass-murderers are usually not snipers (correct me if I am wrong) housecat Jul 2022 #24

I know. You're right. AR-15's are for ideological point-and-shoot maniacs. ancianita Jul 2022 #33

thanks for the info housecat Jul 2022 #44

Send some to Ukraine housecat Jul 2022 #27

They'd just run over to the Russians. Are you sure you know whose side they're on? Not democracy's. ancianita Jul 2022 #35

Whose side who is on? housecat Jul 2022 #42

Oops. "Some" referring to mass shooters? Or were you referring to the guns? ancianita Jul 2022 #46

I think housecat was referring to the rifles. nt MarineCombatEngineer Jul 2022 #62

Thank you. I am simply saying that these guns would help Ukranians eliminate Russians housecat Jul 2022 #64

I like your thinking, MarineCombatEngineer Jul 2022 #65

Exactly. Lemonade from lemons housecat Jul 2022 #74

Thx. Sorry for the mixup. ancianita Jul 2022 #69

Ancianita, please say this another way so I understand what you mean. Are guns running over to the housecat Jul 2022 #63

I mistook that you were referring to shooters, not guns. Sorry. ancianita Jul 2022 #70

No problem. Thanks for responding housecat Jul 2022 #73

Send them all to the Ukranians, and do some good for a change housecat Jul 2022 #23

"...civilian version..." dchill Jul 2022 #25

Ban them for civilians housecat Jul 2022 #26

What's next? Personal rocket launchers? Tanks in your driveway? flying_wahini Jul 2022 #28

I'm personally going old school - gattling guns and canons all the way! Initech Jul 2022 #34

Mines to keep those darned Bettie Jul 2022 #57

Fear mongering aside: the Army decided that the 5.56 nato round was not sufficient for war SYFROYH Jul 2022 #29

Why do we not DEMAND... tosh Jul 2022 #30

Biden could get Austin to do that. But it wouldn't go over well. ancianita Jul 2022 #37

Thank you for this response. tosh Jul 2022 #75

This shit needs to be stopped. There is no way it is needed for private citizens. Evolve Dammit Jul 2022 #32

I have only one question: "Why?" Wednesdays Jul 2022 #36

According to their ad it's for folks to fulfill their fantasy of killing Boomerproud Jul 2022 #67

Funny- but that isn't really anything new. James48 Jul 2022 #38

This is not the 6.8 SPC round, though. sl8 Jul 2022 #43

Ok- I stand corrected- James48 Jul 2022 #49

Keep in mind that's the lower pressure loading and it's from a 16" barrel. sl8 Jul 2022 #54

Apparently, they require more carnage dlk Jul 2022 #39

Question: Why aren't the Second Amendment worshippers pushing for legal hand grenade sales? Eyeball_Kid Jul 2022 #45

because they are already legal in some states DetroitLegalBeagle Jul 2022 #52

If the NRA gets its wishes, all sorts of military stuff will be readily available to the public. sop Jul 2022 #56

Don't tempt them jmowreader Jul 2022 #66

These weapons have been on the market for decades Kaleva Jul 2022 #47

Blah, blah, new ammo, blah, new gun, blah blah....... Lucid Dreamer Jul 2022 #48

The reason why James48 Jul 2022 #51

See my other post about the number of Americans Jilly_in_VA Jul 2022 #58

In other words, you just found out that the.223 Rem is near the low end... krispos42 Jul 2022 #50

+1 Kaleva Jul 2022 #55

And? It's a modified AR-10 firing a modified .308 cartridge NickB79 Jul 2022 #60

I believe the shockwave generated by a high powered round Kaleva Jul 2022 #76

Small arms advertising smells just like cigarette advertising Torchlight Jul 2022 #61

Could some enterprizing gun humper win my approval by taking out Pootin? Stinky The Clown Jul 2022 #72