Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

iemanja

(56,887 posts)

14. No, Clarence Thomas is

Reply to geardaddy (Original post)

Wed Jun 15, 2022, 01:38 PM

Jun 2022

Along with Sotomayor, Kagen, and the rest of the court. How is it people forget that liberals are covered under the increased protection as well? How would people feel if one of the liberal justices were killed?

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

46 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Great tweet: [View all] geardaddy Jun 2022 OP

Boggles the mind, doesn't it? Ferrets are Cool Jun 2022 #1

Yes, yes it does. geardaddy Jun 2022 #2

It does ck4829 Jun 2022 #25

You can't make this up, folks... at least security will be keeping an eye on her. secondwind Jun 2022 #3

Hope they keep an eye out for subversion from her also rurallib Jun 2022 #9

I wish this could be made up ck4829 Jun 2022 #29

Only in America, eh? Wounded Bear Jun 2022 #4

This is getting to be madness ck4829 Jun 2022 #31

K&R ck4829 Jun 2022 #5

Ginni Thomas, the 9.5th SC Justice keithbvadu2 Jun 2022 #6

Really turning out to be that way ck4829 Jun 2022 #32

Hey, January 6 Committee! Kid Berwyn Jun 2022 #7

We really need to ck4829 Jun 2022 #33

Reminded of a West Wing eipisode MissMillie Jun 2022 #8

People with money & power are always catered to KS Toronado Jun 2022 #10

Exactly geardaddy Jun 2022 #11

Nailed it. nt Ilsa Jun 2022 #26

It's disgusting ck4829 Jun 2022 #28

Exactly Solly Mack Jun 2022 #12

It really really is ck4829 Jun 2022 #40

Almost as bad as providing enhanced security to Justices who have left the rest of us more exposed Martin68 Jun 2022 #13

Agreed ck4829 Jun 2022 #30

No, Clarence Thomas is iemanja Jun 2022 #14

No, the enhanced security Farmer-Rick Jun 2022 #21

Quite disgusting, isn't it? ck4829 Jun 2022 #41

And Sotomayor and Kagen? iemanja Jun 2022 #43

But what protects the Supreme Court from the right wing bias? ck4829 Jun 2022 #34

That ship sailed in 2016 iemanja Jun 2022 #42

We refuse to protect children from being shot in school in this country MontanaMama Jun 2022 #15

+1 ck4829 Jun 2022 #22

Moscow Mitch; Are children less important than those judges? keithbvadu2 Jun 2022 #37

Right? MontanaMama Jun 2022 #38

Why Rebl2 Jun 2022 #16

That is a good question ck4829 Jun 2022 #24

Maybe she should hire her own security PatSeg Jun 2022 #17

Right? ck4829 Jun 2022 #23

What's the story here? Who approved special protection for Ginni Thomas? Baitball Blogger Jun 2022 #18

we must protect the ruling class IcyPeas Jun 2022 #19

What's Wrong with that Fucking picture? Cha Jun 2022 #20

That is a very good question, we need an answer ck4829 Jun 2022 #27

Yes, America Does. Cha Jun 2022 #35

Twitter reply: Rhiannon12866 Jun 2022 #36

Yep, where's our protection from her? ck4829 Jun 2022 #39

Good reply! geardaddy Jun 2022 #46

I really think it is from the trump humpers. They didn't know he was in a interracial marriage Oppaloopa Jun 2022 #44

Jo has suddenly become very visible on Twitter, no? BobTheSubgenius Jun 2022 #45