Great tweet:

[geardaddy]

Last edited Wed Jun 15, 2022, 12:26 PM - Edit history (1)

Link to tweet

?s=20&t=NR2PojK6igpxyrIWIRj6pg

🌻
@JoJoFromJerz
·
4h
Wait - Ginni Thomas is now receiving security protection from the very same government she just tried to overthrow?
Are you fucking kidding me?

[Ferrets are Cool]

1. Boggles the mind, doesn't it?

[geardaddy]

2. Yes, yes it does.

[ck4829]

25. It does

[secondwind]

3. You can't make this up, folks... at least security will be keeping an eye on her.

[rurallib]

9. Hope they keep an eye out for subversion from her also

[ck4829]

29. I wish this could be made up

"Hey did you hear about...?"

"That's crazy, did you make this up?"

"I did!"

"Wow, you should write dystopian fiction, that is good! Good thing it's just fiction!"

"I know, right?"

[Wounded Bear]

4. Only in America, eh?

[ck4829]

31. This is getting to be madness

[ck4829]

5. K&R

[keithbvadu2]

6. Ginni Thomas, the 9.5th SC Justice

[ck4829]

32. Really turning out to be that way

[Kid Berwyn]

7. Hey, January 6 Committee!

Call Ginni Thomas to the stand.

[ck4829]

33. We really need to

[MissMillie]

8. Reminded of a West Wing eipisode

The Midterms



Josh: What do you say about a government that goes out of its way to protect even citizens that try to destroy it?

Toby: God bless America.

[KS Toronado]

10. People with money & power are always catered to

Texas grade school kids not so much

[geardaddy]

11. Exactly

[Ilsa]

26. Nailed it. nt

[ck4829]

28. It's disgusting

[Solly Mack]

12. Exactly

Fucked up.

[ck4829]

40. It really really is

[Martin68]

13. Almost as bad as providing enhanced security to Justices who have left the rest of us more exposed

to gun violence than ever before. It pisses me off.

[ck4829]

30. Agreed

[iemanja]

14. No, Clarence Thomas is

Along with Sotomayor, Kagen, and the rest of the court. How is it people forget that liberals are covered under the increased protection as well? How would people feel if one of the liberal justices were killed?

[Farmer-Rick]

21. No, the enhanced security

Also protects all their family members too. Even the ones who try to overthrow our democracy.

[ck4829]

41. Quite disgusting, isn't it?

[iemanja]

43. And Sotomayor and Kagen?

Do you also think it disgusting that they are protected?

[ck4829]

34. But what protects the Supreme Court from the right wing bias?

[iemanja]

42. That ship sailed in 2016

thanks to all the people who refused to vote for Hillary or spread bullshit about her. We are left with the results of their actions.

[MontanaMama]

15. We refuse to protect children from being shot in school in this country

but taxpayers must pay to protect a traitor. Sounds legit. SMDH.

[ck4829]

22. +1

[keithbvadu2]

37. Moscow Mitch; Are children less important than those judges?

If the answer is yes, just say so.

[MontanaMama]

38. Right?

We both know the answer is yes. Judge Boof, Gorsuck, Coathanger Barrett, Alito…they will give Moscow Mitch everything he ever dreamed of…so clearly they’re more important.

[Rebl2]

16. Why

[ck4829]

24. That is a good question

[PatSeg]

17. Maybe she should hire her own security

I'm sure there are some Proud Boys or Oathkeepers who aren't in jail yet.

[ck4829]

23. Right?

[Baitball Blogger]

18. What's the story here? Who approved special protection for Ginni Thomas?

My guess is she has more to fear from her own people who knows she knows too much.

[IcyPeas]

19. we must protect the ruling class

[Cha]

20. What's Wrong with that Fucking picture?

💙💛

[ck4829]

27. That is a very good question, we need an answer

[Cha]

35. Yes, America Does.

💙💛

[Rhiannon12866]

36. Twitter reply:

Link to tweet

[ck4829]

39. Yep, where's our protection from her?

[geardaddy]

46. Good reply!

[Oppaloopa]

44. I really think it is from the trump humpers. They didn't know he was in a interracial marriage

I know this sounds crazy but she is getting the threats not him

[BobTheSubgenius]

45. Jo has suddenly become very visible on Twitter, no?