Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Docreed2003

(18,624 posts)

8. It's should have been plainly evident

Reply to kpete (Original post)

Thu May 5, 2022, 10:09 AM

May 2022

When the right came out with IDENTICAL talking points. This was orchestrated with intent.

That being said, the anger and opposition from our side should in no way be diminished by whether the leak was from the right or left

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

23 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

There really is zero doubt now that the leak came from the right [View all] kpete May 2022 OP

You mean Mitch, Ted and Lindsey weren't serious when they promised the leaker would be jailed? sop May 2022 #1

It is just their form of projection again, blaming dems for something they Bev54 May 2022 #12

Jailed for what? What law was broken? wnylib May 2022 #14

That's what I told my wife days ago. They'd have to jail half of DC for leaks Bengus81 May 2022 #21

Diversion from the upcoming J6 hearings/reports, too. wnylib May 2022 #22

Their unified projection onto the left told me what I needed to know underpants May 2022 #2

Why'd they shop it exclusively to Politico? Budi May 2022 #3

Whoever leaked it had to be absolutely sure he/she would not be identified. Lochloosa May 2022 #6

I've been wondering that myself, but maybe it's because leaking it to Ocelot II May 2022 #7

I think it was an inside job with 2 fold opportunities for Politico. Budi May 2022 #10

100% flamingdem May 2022 #18

There seems to be many, very varied, conflicting, wide ranging opinions on the leak. empedocles May 2022 #4

My bet is on Neil Gorsuch turning. ProudMNDemocrat May 2022 #5

It's should have been plainly evident Docreed2003 May 2022 #8

Agree. Duppers May 2022 #9

Exactly. I agree with Jen Psaki. wnylib May 2022 #15

It could have just been a guess. An easy one at that. twodogsbarking May 2022 #11

The RWNJ have a different target for the leak. usaf-vet May 2022 #13

An obvious dog whistle for the Magats. Meadowoak May 2022 #20

I had been trying to find the WSJ editorial BumRushDaShow May 2022 #16

Kick dalton99a May 2022 #17

maybe it was bdamomma May 2022 #19

i hate to be pedantic but who cares where the leak came from Mr. Sparkle May 2022 #23