Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)Krugman: THIS IS NOT ABOUT STIMULUS. [View all]
Link to tweet
Many of the headlines on the new administration offer get it wrong by emphasizing the headline cost, which makes it sound serious. The key thing is the refusal to extend unemployment benefits, which is cruel and stupid 1/
https://m.huffpost.com/us/entry/us_5fd03846c5b652dce5840381/amp
THIS IS NOT ABOUT STIMULUS. As some of us emphasized all along, when a pandemic is raging the goal shouldn't be to goose the economy but to provide disaster relief to those who can't work because their usual jobs spread the virus 2/
This was true at the beginning: 3/
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/04/02/opinion/coronavirus-economy-stimulus.html
And it's true now, as our negligence has created a wave of infections and deaths bigger than we suffered in the spring 4/
Image
Sending everyone a $600 check totally misses the point. Most people don't need it; meanwhile it's utterly inadequate for those who do need help. Why would anyone propose swapping out unemployment aid for this? 5/
I actually don't know where this is coming from. One possibility is that Trump, still deluded in the belief that he can steal the election, wants another round of checks with his name on them 6/
Another is that Mnuchin is just stupid, that after all this time he still doesn't understand the basics of pandemic economics. OK, I guess these aren't mutually exclusive 7/
Somehow this makes me even angrier than McConnell's stonewalling. MM is at least evil in an understandable way. What we're seeing here, in the final economic act of the Trump admin, is a special mix of cruelty and cluelessness 8/
https://m.huffpost.com/us/entry/us_5fd03846c5b652dce5840381/amp
THIS IS NOT ABOUT STIMULUS. As some of us emphasized all along, when a pandemic is raging the goal shouldn't be to goose the economy but to provide disaster relief to those who can't work because their usual jobs spread the virus 2/
This was true at the beginning: 3/
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/04/02/opinion/coronavirus-economy-stimulus.html
And it's true now, as our negligence has created a wave of infections and deaths bigger than we suffered in the spring 4/
Image
Sending everyone a $600 check totally misses the point. Most people don't need it; meanwhile it's utterly inadequate for those who do need help. Why would anyone propose swapping out unemployment aid for this? 5/
I actually don't know where this is coming from. One possibility is that Trump, still deluded in the belief that he can steal the election, wants another round of checks with his name on them 6/
Another is that Mnuchin is just stupid, that after all this time he still doesn't understand the basics of pandemic economics. OK, I guess these aren't mutually exclusive 7/
Somehow this makes me even angrier than McConnell's stonewalling. MM is at least evil in an understandable way. What we're seeing here, in the final economic act of the Trump admin, is a special mix of cruelty and cluelessness 8/
48 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

It's based on the fallacy that if we just goose the economy we can get back to where we were
Klaralven
Dec 2020
#1
"Most people don't need it; meanwhile utterly inadequate for those who do need help."
bucolic_frolic
Dec 2020
#3
I doubt people - poor or middle class - did anything other than bank it IF they could
bucolic_frolic
Dec 2020
#23
Maybe have the limit be 55,000 instead of the 75,000 it was at per adult
questionseverything
Dec 2020
#48
What's telling is how other countries gave checks out monthly large enough to prevent harm
duforsure
Dec 2020
#4
This is why I'm glad any time I hear someone refer to it as 'relief', instead of...
Hugin
Dec 2020
#8
"...a special mix of cruelty and cluelessness." That sounds right. Totally inadequate for millions.
Evolve Dammit
Dec 2020
#13
And a friend continues to work even though she knows she was exposed...just got the job and
Demsrule86
Dec 2020
#32