PhenyxReturns
(26 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Nov-30-06 02:35 PM
Original message |
bloom
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Nov-30-06 02:44 PM
Response to Original message |
1. You're right - the ad at top is sexist. |
|
Of course - you might have a different ad.
|
PhenyxReturns
(26 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Nov-30-06 02:48 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
|
...I myself couldn't believe we are still preventing people from playing on a sports team based on their gender. then again, I'm sure you already knew that.
|
lukasahero
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Nov-30-06 02:54 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
3. Which is a fair and valid point, however, |
|
this being the "Women's Rights" forum and not the "Sexism" forum, perhaps you might have included some context to your post to clue people in to what you're thinking about the article?
|
PhenyxReturns
(26 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Nov-30-06 02:57 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
4. Since there really is no forum... |
|
...designed for this specific topic, and it being in part a Title IX issue, this seemed the most appropriate place. Besides? Isn't sexism a women's issue?
|
Wickerman
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Nov-30-06 08:18 PM
Response to Original message |
|
probably a better fit in General Discussion with a bit of context to explain the link.
Thanks,
Wickerman DU Moderator
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Sat Oct 11th 2025, 12:51 PM
Response to Original message |