Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Vitamin-D deficiency linked to fatal stroke in whites but not blacks

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Health Donate to DU
 
Elmore Furth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-15-10 02:06 PM
Original message
Vitamin-D deficiency linked to fatal stroke in whites but not blacks
I take 1000 IU vitamin D every day. Here is more evidence supporting it.



Although blacks had higher rates of both fatal stroke and vitamin-D deficiency, racial differences did not explain the excess risk in blacks compared with whites, said lead author Dr Erin Michos (Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD).

In whites, vitamin-D deficiency was associated with a twofold increase in fatal stroke after adjustment for other risk factors.

A randomized placebo-controlled trial, the Vitamin D and Omega-3 Trial (VITAL), funded by the National Institutes of Health and run by Harvard Medical School and Brigham and Women's Hospital, is currently investigating whether 2000-IU daily vitamin D or fish oil containing about 1 g of omega-3 fatty acids reduces incident cancer, heart disease, or stroke. Investigators plan to enroll 25% black subjects in that trial.

"We certainly await those results before we can strongly endorse widespread screening and treatment programs for vitamin-D deficiency," Michos concluded. "But while we're waiting for the clinical-trial data, I think there are compelling enough data that I do recommend screening for vitamin-D deficiency. It's very common, and doses of 1000 to 2000 IU a day appear safe with little downside, and we know it has good benefit for the bone."


Vitamin-D deficiency linked to fatal stroke in whites but not blacks
Refresh | +4 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-15-10 02:40 PM
Response to Original message
1. "racial differences did not explain the excess risk in blacks compared with whites, said lead author
Am I reading that line wrong or is white and black reversed?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
supernova Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-15-10 04:24 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. I think you're right
Edited on Mon Nov-15-10 04:28 PM by supernova
It seems to be reversed.

The biggest risk, scientifically speaking is is whites, rather than blacks. And the science is still out on why this is so according to the article.

The sentence should read:

"racial differences did not explain the excess risk in whites compared with blacks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat Oct 11th 2025, 09:33 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Health Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC