Sticking up for gluten
Gluten-free has become synonymous with a healthy diet for many, which does a terrible disservice to this useful little protein, writes Brian Dunning.
By Brian Dunning, Citizen Special February 7, 2011 7:38 AM
It has become one of the new fads in health food stores: A gluten-free diet can treat autism, obesity, or any of a wide variety of conditions, they say. But is gluten really something that most people should avoid?
<snip>
But there's a growing trend to portray gluten in a negative light. A few people are born with gluten sensitivities. A non-sequitur line of reasoning has followed: if some people can't tolerate it, it therefore must be bad for everyone. In response, some promoters of fad diets and various quack health schemes are now advocating gluten-free diets.<snip>
Yet those whose business is the sale of gluten-free products would often have us believe that many more of us should buy them. Some claim their products help people with autism or ADHD, which is completely untrue according to all the science we have. The autism claim in particular is broadly repeated across the autism activist community.
A 2006 double-blinded study published in the Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders tested children with and without autism, on gluten-free and placebo controlled diets, and found no significant differences in any group. Some naturopaths routinely list gluten as a cause of disease in general. This is a medically bizarre claim. Proteins are essential for nutrition, and there is no evidence that incidence of disease increased worldwide once wheat became a staple. Bread contains carbohydrates, which are not essential and can be safely minimized in the diet, but by no logic should the strategy of avoiding carbohydrates extend to avoiding gluten.
More:
http://www.ottawacitizen.com/health/Sticking+gluten/4234087/story.htmlHat-tip to:
http://twitter.com/JonathanAbrams/status/34642624891592705