Boojatta
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-09-11 02:51 PM
Original message |
Are the words "Non-Euclidean Geometry" more well-known than the words "Pasch's Axiom"? |
|
If they are more well-known, then I will be able to ask a question that is (in my opinion) much more interesting than the question in the title of this thread.
|
SidDithers
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-09-11 02:52 PM
Response to Original message |
arcane1
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-09-11 02:54 PM
Response to Original message |
2. More well-known to me, anyway n/t |
Buzz Clik
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-09-11 02:57 PM
Response to Original message |
3. Non-Euclidian geometry sounds familiar because Euclidian geometry is typically studied. |
|
Edited on Wed Feb-09-11 02:57 PM by Buzz Clik
non-Euclidian geometry is far less familiar. I know of Pasch's axiom.
|
phantom power
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-09-11 03:03 PM
Response to Original message |
4. The answer to your 1st question is "yes" |
here_is_to_hope
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-09-11 03:20 PM
Response to Original message |
VWolf
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-09-11 03:41 PM
Response to Original message |
|
I studied general relativity
|
saras
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-09-11 04:02 PM
Response to Original message |
|
I've known non-euclidian geometry since I was a kid (4th grade or so). I had to look up Pasch's axiom just now.
|
FBaggins
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-10-11 08:59 AM
Response to Original message |
8. Of course. Just as more people have heard of baseball... |
|
...than the infield-fly rule.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Mon Oct 13th 2025, 08:22 AM
Response to Original message |