Bloodblister Bob
(269 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Oct-29-05 02:24 PM
Original message |
Won't Bush simply pardon them all? |
|
Does anyone in the Bush administration really have anything to fear if they are indicted, besides perhaps losing their jobs?
Won't Bush just pardon them so they can cash in on book deals, made-for-TV movies, and hit the talk show circuit?
I think this is all just an inconvenince for Libby, Rove, et al.
|
valerief
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Oct-29-05 02:26 PM
Response to Original message |
1. If the law prevents him from pardoning them, then |
|
the Repub Congress will create a law allowing it. We'll be too busy with "natural" disasters and terrrrrrr attacks.
|
jasop
(172 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Oct-29-05 02:27 PM
Response to Original message |
2. Just Like Daddy Bush pardoned all he and Reagan's Crime buddies - n/t |
Bernardo de La Paz
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Oct-29-05 02:28 PM
Response to Original message |
3. Unlikely. * could easily be impeached for it & his presidency => mega-lame |
tatertop
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Oct-29-05 02:29 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
5. We will never get the votes needed to impeach |
|
Besides, Lieberman would never allow it.
|
jobycom
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Oct-29-05 02:35 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
11. Lieberman would love to impeach Bush. |
|
It's all about his ego, and payback for Florida. Revenge is best served cold, and all that.
If Bush pardons them at the wrong time, the pressure on the House (who does the impeaching) to impeach will be intense. They will not risk defeat to support a lame duck president who's dead in the water. The Senate might even get the votes to remove him.
But Bush will likely play it smarter. He'll let the courts tie up the indictments and trials for years, then pardon them when the political climate has changed, or after the 2006 elections when Congress won't have to care, or if possible after the 2008 elections, when it just won't matter.
Bottom line is, he has to pardon, so they can't be forced to testify against him.
|
Loge23
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Oct-29-05 02:42 PM
Response to Reply #11 |
14. Oh please, Lieberman? |
|
If Bush does pardon them, it won;t matter. The repugs will be finished for our lifetime. But don't seriously suggest that Lieberman has the balls to do anything worthwhile about it.
|
jobycom
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Oct-29-05 03:12 PM
Response to Reply #14 |
|
Lieberman is like Senator Palpatine (even looks like him). He's a backrooms guy. He supports Bush on the invasion only because it gives him what he wants. He supports the Dems when it helps him.
He'd gut Bush in a heartbeat for stealing the election from him. He's one of the shrewdest politicians in DC, and more ruthless than people see.
That's not meant to be a compliment.
|
tatertop
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Oct-29-05 02:45 PM
Response to Reply #11 |
16. It is good to quote Oscar Wilde! |
|
The republicans control the vote. While the republicans continue to control the vote they shall do as they please.
|
liberalnurse
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Oct-29-05 02:42 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
15. Oh, I bet he would. His bread is no longer being buttered |
|
by *bush and company. They have been seriously stained too. DINO Joe will try and get back in the good graces of the DLC.
|
jobycom
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Oct-29-05 02:29 PM
Response to Original message |
4. Yes he will, just like Daddy did. |
|
Bush will pardon them all, not to keep them out of jail, but so they can't be forced to testify against him. The only question is when. He will wait as long as he can, because a poorly timed pardon could lead to a massive backlash against him, and maybe even an investigation by Congress into impeachment. Libby and anyone else indicted will just continue to lie and obstruct, and hope to push their trials back by several years, so that Bush can pardon them after it's too late to impeach him.
That's why his Daddy and half of his own administration didn't go to jail over Iran-Contra.
|
stepnw1f
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Oct-29-05 02:29 PM
Response to Original message |
|
and those guily must be brought to justice regardless.
|
tatertop
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Oct-29-05 02:30 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
7. True, but he will pardon him as soon as he can |
jobycom
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Oct-29-05 02:35 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
12. Weren't you supposed to use this? |
unrepuke
(763 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Oct-29-05 02:32 PM
Response to Original message |
thereismore
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Oct-29-05 02:33 PM
Response to Original message |
9. so what. the damage is done nt |
BlueWolf
(64 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Oct-29-05 02:33 PM
Response to Original message |
10. As far as I know, he could |
|
I heard on Air America that he could simply pardon them all. It's quite common for presidents to do that. Somebody else can take the fall for the prez or the vice prez, knowing that they will just be pardoned. Bush senior did that with many of his cronies indicted in the Iran-Contra affair. It really places the president above the law. Whatever comes of it, I just hope more voters turn Democratic after all this.
|
liberalnurse
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Oct-29-05 02:37 PM
Response to Original message |
13. I seriously doubt it.... |
|
If he does, Libby and the rest of the outlaws will have be rendered useless by then anyways. See this thread from this morning. http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=104x5216306
|
Joe Chi Minh
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Oct-29-05 02:59 PM
Response to Reply #13 |
17. Also, it will mean they will be pardoned by a |
|
Edited on Sat Oct-29-05 03:02 PM by KCabotDullesMarxIII
President as a result of at least one fraudulent election, i.e. the last one and only de facto. If the ubiquitous fraud is proved, then it will mean they will be double beneficiaries of the proceeds of a crime. They will have enjoyed the proceeds and then been pardoned. Does his sound like the rule of law to you?
|
liberalnurse
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Oct-29-05 05:11 PM
Response to Reply #17 |
19. It will never go down like you describe. |
|
This is deep and will change the nation before it is over.
|
Joe Chi Minh
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Oct-30-05 10:27 AM
Response to Reply #19 |
20. I believe you are right, but was hypothesising as to the |
|
implications of the alternative.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Sun Oct 12th 2025, 03:45 AM
Response to Original message |