Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Clinton laughs off Colombia questions

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Politics/Campaigns Donate to DU
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-11-08 11:35 AM
Original message
Clinton laughs off Colombia questions
CNN: April 11, 2008
Clinton laughs off Colombia questions

PITTSBURGH, Pennsylvania (CNN) – Hillary Clinton used her trademark laugh Thursday to deflect a question about the $800,000 her husband earned in 2005 giving speeches for a Bogota-based group that supports the Colombia free trade agreement — the same trade deal she currently opposes.

Asked by CNN if those earnings represented a conflict of interest given that she has dipped into her family's pocketbook to pay campaign bills, Clinton threw up her hands and laughed loudly for several seconds. "How many angels dance on the head of the pin?," she responded, continuing to giggle. "I have really, uh, nothing to … I mean, how do you answer that?"

The New York senator explained there are different sides to the argument over trade, and re-emphasized her own opposition to the trade deal, assailing the Colombian government's "outrageous" record of "targeting labor leaders."

"I am against the Colombia free trade deal," she said. "It doesn't matter who talks to me. It doesn't matter any circumstances. I have been against it. I am against it. I will be against it absent the kind of changes in behavior that I have been calling for from the Colombian government."

Earlier in the press conference, describing her husband's advocacy for the trade deal, Clinton said: "Everyone is free to express their opinion."

http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/04/11/clinton-laughs-off-colombia-questions/
Refresh | +3 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-11-08 11:37 AM
Response to Original message
1. She should say he is going to give it back. How hard is that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-11-08 11:38 AM
Response to Original message
2. I wish she just would have stuck with her statement:
"I am against the Colombia free trade deal," she said. "It doesn't matter who talks to me. It doesn't matter any circumstances. I have been against it. I am against it. I will be against it absent the kind of changes in behavior that I have been calling for from the Colombian government."

(which I think is pretty good)

Laughing makes me feel as though she's dismissing our legitimate concerns. We're taking it seriously, and she doesn't care? That's the impression it gives me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
polichick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-11-08 11:40 AM
Response to Original message
3. Hiding behind the laugh doesn't work so well anymore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
roseBudd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-13-08 06:45 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. The laugh is weird. Someone asks you a question and you laugh? And the question is not funny?
Inappropriate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
angstlessk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-11-08 11:42 AM
Response to Original message
4. She cares not that it will take jobs away from americans...just that Colombia
be 'nice' to labor unions so they can be disbanded peacefully like in the good ole USofA! :grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
damntexdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-11-08 12:03 PM
Response to Original message
5. Well, after all, assassinations of union organizers is just so funny.
How can HRC help but laugh at it all?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
MadAndy Donating Member (202 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-11-08 12:06 PM
Response to Original message
6. I think the Chewbaca defense would have been more effective than the cackle.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Oct 15th 2025, 02:24 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Politics/Campaigns Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC