Tabasco_Dave
(744 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-01-11 11:26 PM
Original message |
These Models look angry and depressed. |
|
How is this supposed to sell clothes? :scared: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XQns6xRXnLI
|
GoneOffShore
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-01-11 11:29 PM
Response to Original message |
1. You're supposed to look at the clothes - not the models |
Gold Metal Flake
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-01-11 11:37 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
5. I'd never thought of that before. |
begin_within
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-01-11 11:30 PM
Response to Original message |
2. I'd be angry and depressed too, if I had to wear stuff like that. |
Lasher
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Dec-02-11 01:14 AM
Response to Reply #2 |
7. If I wore boots like that my neighbors would beat me up. |
RebelOne
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Dec-02-11 01:37 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
11. Actually, I love the boots, |
|
but would not wear them unless they were faux fur. I am totally anti-fur.
|
elleng
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-01-11 11:33 PM
Response to Original message |
3. They have for years, and the clothing has sucked too. |
Skittles
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-01-11 11:35 PM
Response to Original message |
4. chronic hunger will do that to you |
freshwest
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-01-11 11:47 PM
Response to Original message |
6. I think they're told to look that way. It's been the style for years. I think they were all... |
|
Good looking women, very strong and athletic. I've seen much thinner women in my neighborhood who are perfectly healthy, but they are not muscular like these women.
It does look like they have been trained to have that perfect gait, every movement choreographed. They're going very fast, which is typical. As far as the clothes, I thought about half were good, but not at all practical.
As far as being ticked off, if that is not something they affect, they're being run through just like dogs at a pure breed dog show. And it's all about their bodies and the clothes (tricks to show them off) and not a thing about them.
I expect most of them are paid very well for this Other than a look at what I guess are called 'the beautiful people,' I don't find this interesting. If they are pissed off about fashion models, they might want to try to learn something else.
And I'm not a fan of the fashion industry. Give me work clothes, and the rest is for those with leisure and money to burn. But it takes all kinds to make a world interesting.
Thanks for posting that. I'd have never found anything like that.
:hi:
|
HopeHoops
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Dec-02-11 09:33 AM
Response to Original message |
8. If you had to parade around wearing that crap in time to techno-shit music, wouldn't you be? |
|
That was terrible and I only got through the first minute or so.
|
distantearlywarning
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Dec-02-11 09:38 AM
Response to Original message |
9. You would too if you were hungry all the time. |
|
Nothing wrong with these women a few delicious cheeseburgers wouldn't cure!
|
Bake
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Dec-02-11 01:30 PM
Response to Original message |
10. They all look pissed off to me. |
|
ANybody ever heard of SMILING??? And could somebody buy them a decent meal?? All skin and bones!!
:hi:
Bake
|
TreasonousBastard
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Dec-02-11 02:12 PM
Response to Original message |
12. It's the "pissed off runway look" and it's to show you that this is... |
|
serious fashion, not K-Mart stuff or circus costumes.
(So, who wears the furry boots, thick sweater, and leaves all that leg exposed when it snows?)
|
Maine-ah
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Dec-02-11 02:26 PM
Response to Original message |
13. no way in hell would I wear any of that shit in winter |
|
I'd freeze my ass off up here.
|
lumpy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Dec-02-11 08:10 PM
Response to Reply #13 |
19. Can you imagine in a hundred years how ridiculous these |
|
fashions will look. As stupid as Louis 14th powered wigs and satin breeches.
|
HappyMe
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Dec-02-11 02:31 PM
Response to Original message |
14. Maybe the clothes are itchy. |
|
I'm surprised my ears aren't bleeding from that 'music'.
|
applegrove
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Dec-02-11 05:23 PM
Response to Original message |
15. Did you hear the one about Kate Moss being pregnant? Turns out she just had an egg for lunch! |
frogmarch
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Dec-02-11 05:37 PM
Response to Original message |
|
supposed to not smile in order to keep prospective buyers’ attention away from the models themselves and focused on the clothing, why don’t designers just put the clothing on wire hangers and hook the hangers onto a revolving clothesline? Some of the models are so thin that I don’t think the clothing would look much different if it were on hangers anyway.
|
alphafemale
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Dec-02-11 06:17 PM
Response to Original message |
17. at 3:16 it looked like that girl almost smiled....must have been gas. |
alphafemale
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Dec-02-11 06:18 PM
Response to Original message |
18. Although it looks like we may be about to foist leg-warmers once again upon unsuspecting youth. |
|
Edited on Fri Dec-02-11 06:19 PM by alphafemale
:rofl:
|
provis99
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Dec-02-11 10:01 PM
Response to Original message |
20. they all look like angry Viking Valkyries. |
|
maybe they just had a hard day hunting warrior souls for Odin?
|
jmowreader
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Dec-02-11 10:18 PM
Response to Original message |
21. They found out what they're getting paid for the gig |
|
And combined with the general blah-ness of the clothes, that would piss anyone off.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Sat Oct 11th 2025, 12:38 PM
Response to Original message |