Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search

Democratic Primaries
In reply to the discussion: Natasha Bertrand: IC would *not* have told Sanders to remain silent about campaign meddling [View all]still_one
(98,883 posts)27. Early voting began today in California where voting centers will be open everyday through March 3
I haven't voted yet, but vote by mail
I will vote after the SC primary

primary today, I would vote for: Joe Biden
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
88 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations

Natasha Bertrand: IC would *not* have told Sanders to remain silent about campaign meddling [View all]
Dennis Donovan
Feb 2020
OP
Me too, polls cnd results may have been different. IMO both may have been influenced by russian help
brush
Feb 2020
#28
He was clearly angry yesterday that this didn't remain quiet until tonight or tomorrow.
George II
Feb 2020
#2
This was a test of leadership and integrity and Bernie failed it... BIG TIME!
NurseJackie
Feb 2020
#19
Transparency is also lacking about his health records, tax returns and Our Revolution PAC donors.
SunSeeker
Feb 2020
#15
She is a national aecurity correspondent who works for Politico snd appears on NBC and MSNBC
CentralMass
Feb 2020
#11
Yes, because everyone has known for 3+ years Putin is interfering in our elections (nt)
mr_lebowski
Feb 2020
#33
That's different than knowing that Putin was specifically helping Bernie in the 2020 Dem primary.
SunSeeker
Feb 2020
#37
No, it's really not ... everyone already knows Putin was helping Bernie and IQ45 in 2016.
mr_lebowski
Feb 2020
#43
And the IC at any point could have chosen to release any declassified version of nformation
Tom Rinaldo
Feb 2020
#21
I realize if Sanders was briefed as a US Senator or if he were on the Intel committee
Dennis Donovan
Feb 2020
#57
No, Sanders could've denounced outside involvement in US elections the second he found out & decided
uponit7771
Feb 2020
#73
+1. They never stopped helping him. Their assistance was evident on social media last year.
dalton99a
Feb 2020
#26
Early voting began today in California where voting centers will be open everyday through March 3
still_one
Feb 2020
#27
Don't you find it odd that Democratic members of the House Intelligence Committee also didn't
totodeinhere
Feb 2020
#29
Nice try. Bernie failed this test of integrity and leadership and honestly.
NurseJackie
Feb 2020
#32
The same reason that Obama said nothing... it wasn't "his place" to say anything.
NurseJackie
Feb 2020
#49
Give me a break. If he gets the most primary and caucus votes then he deserves to be our nominee.
totodeinhere
Feb 2020
#39
I can only guess, but premature disclosure of this information might have compromised an ongoing
totodeinhere
Feb 2020
#48
As Nurse Jackie explained to you, It was BERNIE'S place to disclose the info:
SunSeeker
Feb 2020
#64
One just can't trust a candidate who just had a heart attack and won't release his medical records
onetexan
Feb 2020
#54
That was the Bush admin, the IC did NOT stay quiet IE Valery Plame getting outed.
uponit7771
Feb 2020
#74