Democratic Primaries

Bhphoto

(45 posts)

6. Both False and misleading

Sun Oct 27, 2019, 03:59 PM

Oct 2019

You strategically compared her to "many House members" without telling us how many House members waited as long as she did to say they supported an inquiry.
And you falsely that the "Ukrainian thing" was not in the news at the time she opposed it. It was.
It was the transcript that she cited as the alleged reason for her flip flop.
Other major Democratic candidates supported an inquiry without reading the Whistleblower transcript.

Can you please tell us what your preferred candidate said about Ukraine-related impeachment before Tulsi said the transcript swayed her? (Assuming you truly are a Warren supporter).

If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for: Joe Biden

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

12 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Why you should not believe Tulsi when she says she won't run as third-party [View all] Bhphoto Oct 2019 OP

She has been so loud as she proclaims no 3rd party run for her! CaliforniaPeggy Oct 2019 #1

Like many other dems in the house, she was against the impeachment inquiries until the Ukraine thing thesquanderer Oct 2019 #2

Both False and misleading Bhphoto Oct 2019 #6

Wrong, and unnecessarily accusatory. thesquanderer Oct 2019 #9

Tulsi Gabbard: Trump-Zelensky transcript didn't change my mind Bhphoto Oct 2019 #10

I thought it was the transcript. It was *something* about the Ukraine story that changed her mind. thesquanderer Oct 2019 #12

Post removed Post removed Oct 2019 #3

A Trust Issue? Me. Oct 2019 #4

After reading up on Gabbert BigMin28 Oct 2019 #5

So Gabbard is attacked here for a rumor that Voltaire2 Oct 2019 #7

I only criticized her for being dishonest Bhphoto Oct 2019 #8

I really doubt she's going to run third party. cwydro Oct 2019 #11