Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

zazen

(2,978 posts)
3. I'm less surprised by the findings than by human subjects violation of identifying the institution
Mon Jan 12, 2015, 03:10 PM
Jan 2015

I thought IRB was tougher. It seems IRBs stop all sorts of trivial things—including keeping feminist scholars from doing serious studies on how violent pornography shapes (and IMO distorts sexuality)—and then let something like this violation of the respondents' identities get through. It's called "deductive disclosure."

Sorry, but we already knew the extent and recalcitrance of what this generation is calling rape culture. So now the university will be looking for the 20-some-odd potential rapists on the campus, and good luck getting honest responses in the future.

This will distract from the larger issue and will just cause much better, more original and rigorous research to get shut down--mark my words. Look for the upcoming debate in the Chronicle. I give it a week.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Alliance Forums»History of Feminism»Disturbing Article - 1 In...»Reply #3