2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: Why would a Democrat vote for H. Clinton and Citizens United? [View all]BainsBane
(56,840 posts)Falsely claim a candidate is for it who clearly articulates policies to the contrary on her website?
Why would someone who claims to care about policy go to such lengths to avoid familiarizing themselves with the policy of a leading Democratic candidate and repeatedly misrepresent her positions?
And why would people who want to see the corruption of government through money pretend it hinges on a single supreme court ruling and fail to inform themselves about the myriad of rulings, starting with Buckley, that make the situation possible?
I see only two possible explanations for the repeated misrepresentation of a candidate's position on issues. 1) Policy has little to nothing to do with their opposition to the candidate, because if it did they wouldn't have to continually and willfully misrepresent (the most likely option). 2) But why then create false positions? It's almost as if they want their projections to be true.
Edit history
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):