Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

okaawhatever

(9,563 posts)
22. Mann is refusing to settle. He wants this to go to court and be heard. I think he wants case law and
Fri Jan 31, 2014, 01:56 AM
Jan 2014

public awareness. I've read that most plaintiff's in his position are discouraged by the discovery process, but Mann has been through that with the government so he knows and isn't concerned.
This is a little more cut and dry than a regular slander case because Steyn wrote that he manipulated data. That is a pretty cut and dry argument for rebuttal. I'm going to love if this goes to court and the outcome is that the data for Mann's findings on climate change are accurate and based on solid scientific evidence.
The oil companies will make sure Steyn never works again. Poetic justice.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

This case survived the motion to dismiss Gothmog Jan 2014 #1
Thanks G~ Cha Jan 2014 #24
Republicans never know when to fucking shut up. They imagine themselves badasses TwilightGardener Jan 2014 #2
Actually, they imagine that they own EVERYTHING including the courts.... Spitfire of ATJ Jan 2014 #10
DNA coding bpj62 Jan 2014 #20
How sad. truebluegreen Jan 2014 #3
Mark Steyn is a lunatic. stopbush Jan 2014 #4
He's also BobbyBoring Jan 2014 #7
Defamation hard to prove but not impossible. Publicly accusing a research scientist of fraud yellowcanine Jan 2014 #5
Mann is refusing to settle. He wants this to go to court and be heard. I think he wants case law and okaawhatever Jan 2014 #22
The Koch Brothers will bail them out. PeoViejo Jan 2014 #6
them or Shelly Adelson nt geek tragedy Jan 2014 #8
lol at your sig line. rofl Cha Jan 2014 #25
The Kochs are 73 and 78. Sheldon Adelson is 80. tclambert Jan 2014 #13
Weeping not in the vocabulary saidsimplesimon Jan 2014 #16
I think that is a decent question davidpdx Jan 2014 #26
They almost certainly have staffs who will carry on their troglodyte traditions jmowreader Feb 2014 #29
I have high hopes for Mann's case. Aldo Leopold Jan 2014 #9
I agree, and I hope Mann doesn't settle out of court. I hope he takes it all Nay Jan 2014 #11
National Review is still around? Warpy Jan 2014 #12
My dim recollection is that the Review has been on life support for a long time... Orsino Jan 2014 #14
Oh, dear struggle4progress Jan 2014 #15
I hope he wins all of the "intellectual" property, copyrights and trademarks eggplant Jan 2014 #17
Sounds like the Koch brothers are going to have to provide a bunch more money . . . another_liberal Jan 2014 #18
I believe Mr. Buckley is turning over in his grave Jack Rabbit Jan 2014 #19
The individual defendant fired his legal counsel and is defending this case pro se Gothmog Jan 2014 #21
Eeeek! Hubris thy name is Mark Steyn.. Cha Jan 2014 #23
Darn - I'll have to go back to buying regular toilet paper lame54 Feb 2014 #27
Here is another article on this lawsuit Gothmog Feb 2014 #28
Possible Reason for attacking judge hobie Feb 2014 #30
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»A defamation lawsuit may ...»Reply #22