Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Gothmog

(171,729 posts)
21. The individual defendant fired his legal counsel and is defending this case pro se
Thu Jan 30, 2014, 08:17 PM
Jan 2014

The individual defendant who wrote the stupid attack has fired a very good law firm because that law firm would not approve of this idiot writing an article attacking the judge http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2014/01/30/climate-scientists-lawsuit-could-wipe-out-conservative-national-review-magazine/


Then, at Christmastime, Steyn abruptly fired the legal team representing him and the magazine, white shoe firm Steptoe and Johnson, after an argument over a highly inflammatory — and appallingly typed — NRO post about Judge Combs Greene. Steyn accused her of “staggering incompetence,” called her stupid, and accused her of deliberate obtuseness regarding the Mann suit.

Now, Steyn is representing himself against Mann and he and the Review have parted ways.

Steyn wrote to Mother Jones, saying that he was simply no longer able to contain his sense of disdain for the federal judge and her decision not to dismiss Mann’s suit.

Firing your counsel in the middle of case is not a good idea. The fact that Steyn is representing himself is bad news for the National Review. Steyn is out of control and is probably judgment proof, i.e., he has nothing to lose if Prof. Mann wins the lawsuit. Steyn's stupidity could well hurt the chances of the National Review in defending this lawsuit.

Finally, I love the fact that Rich Lowery is begging for donations. From the article cited above

As many of you know, National Review is not a non-profit — we are just not profitable. A lawsuit is not something we can fund with money we don’t have. Of course, we’ll do whatever we have to do to find ourselves victorious in court and Professor Mann thoroughly defeated, as he so richly deserves to be. Meanwhile, we have to hire attorneys, which ain’t cheap.

The bills are already mounting.

This is our fight, legally. But with the global-warming extremists going all-out to silence critics, it’s your fight too, morally. When we were sued, we heard from many of you who expressed a desire to help underwrite our legal defense. We deeply appreciated the outpouring of promised help.

Now we really need it.

Lowery is desperate and he should be worried. Prof. Mann has a great case and should win this lawsuit

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

This case survived the motion to dismiss Gothmog Jan 2014 #1
Thanks G~ Cha Jan 2014 #24
Republicans never know when to fucking shut up. They imagine themselves badasses TwilightGardener Jan 2014 #2
Actually, they imagine that they own EVERYTHING including the courts.... Spitfire of ATJ Jan 2014 #10
DNA coding bpj62 Jan 2014 #20
How sad. truebluegreen Jan 2014 #3
Mark Steyn is a lunatic. stopbush Jan 2014 #4
He's also BobbyBoring Jan 2014 #7
Defamation hard to prove but not impossible. Publicly accusing a research scientist of fraud yellowcanine Jan 2014 #5
Mann is refusing to settle. He wants this to go to court and be heard. I think he wants case law and okaawhatever Jan 2014 #22
The Koch Brothers will bail them out. PeoViejo Jan 2014 #6
them or Shelly Adelson nt geek tragedy Jan 2014 #8
lol at your sig line. rofl Cha Jan 2014 #25
The Kochs are 73 and 78. Sheldon Adelson is 80. tclambert Jan 2014 #13
Weeping not in the vocabulary saidsimplesimon Jan 2014 #16
I think that is a decent question davidpdx Jan 2014 #26
They almost certainly have staffs who will carry on their troglodyte traditions jmowreader Feb 2014 #29
I have high hopes for Mann's case. Aldo Leopold Jan 2014 #9
I agree, and I hope Mann doesn't settle out of court. I hope he takes it all Nay Jan 2014 #11
National Review is still around? Warpy Jan 2014 #12
My dim recollection is that the Review has been on life support for a long time... Orsino Jan 2014 #14
Oh, dear struggle4progress Jan 2014 #15
I hope he wins all of the "intellectual" property, copyrights and trademarks eggplant Jan 2014 #17
Sounds like the Koch brothers are going to have to provide a bunch more money . . . another_liberal Jan 2014 #18
I believe Mr. Buckley is turning over in his grave Jack Rabbit Jan 2014 #19
The individual defendant fired his legal counsel and is defending this case pro se Gothmog Jan 2014 #21
Eeeek! Hubris thy name is Mark Steyn.. Cha Jan 2014 #23
Darn - I'll have to go back to buying regular toilet paper lame54 Feb 2014 #27
Here is another article on this lawsuit Gothmog Feb 2014 #28
Possible Reason for attacking judge hobie Feb 2014 #30
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»A defamation lawsuit may ...»Reply #21