Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
Showing Original Post only (View all)A defamation lawsuit may kill National Review [View all]
Conservatism's flagship publication is losing a legal battle that could end in disasterELIAS ISQUITH
National Review, the leading right-wing magazine founded by William F. Buckley, is in a world of trouble and they have one of their most popular columnists, Mark Steyn, to thank.
Steyn, as well as the magazine he writes for, are being sued by influential climate scientist Michael Mann for defamation. Mann took issue with a piece by Steyn in which the columnist accused Mann of fraud and approvingly quoted another right-wing writer, who wrote that Mann was the Jerry Sandusky of climate science, except that instead of molesting children, he has molested and tortured data.
Usually, defamation is a charge thats notoriously hard to make stick in the American legal system. So National Reviews initial response to Manns suit was to shrug it off and decline to apologize. But now that Manns suit has gone to court, things are looking considerably different. Two separate judges have disagreed with National Reviews argument that Manns suit should be dismissed and now the discovery phase is set to begin.
Most remarkable, however, has been the behavior of Steyn the one who got National Review into this mess in the first place. Rather than keep quiet and keep his head down, Steyn at one point wrote a caustic blog post which described one of the judges reviewing the case as stupid and incompetent. The predictable result of this brazen act of self-destruction was Steyns being dumped by the law firm tasked with defending him. And it looks like the firm is soon to show National Review the door, too.
No matter whos representing them, however, the outlook for the folks running National Review is grim. Like many political magazines, National Review has a relatively small (but influential) circulation, and frequently loses money. Breaking even is a good year. So a large settlement with Mann, or a penalty handed down by a judge, could prove catastrophic.
###
http://www.salon.com/2014/01/30/a_defamation_lawsuit_may_kill_national_review/
30 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

Republicans never know when to fucking shut up. They imagine themselves badasses
TwilightGardener
Jan 2014
#2
Actually, they imagine that they own EVERYTHING including the courts....
Spitfire of ATJ
Jan 2014
#10
Defamation hard to prove but not impossible. Publicly accusing a research scientist of fraud
yellowcanine
Jan 2014
#5
Mann is refusing to settle. He wants this to go to court and be heard. I think he wants case law and
okaawhatever
Jan 2014
#22
They almost certainly have staffs who will carry on their troglodyte traditions
jmowreader
Feb 2014
#29
My dim recollection is that the Review has been on life support for a long time...
Orsino
Jan 2014
#14
Sounds like the Koch brothers are going to have to provide a bunch more money . . .
another_liberal
Jan 2014
#18
The individual defendant fired his legal counsel and is defending this case pro se
Gothmog
Jan 2014
#21