Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

napoleon_in_rags

(3,992 posts)
26. You make some good points there.
Wed Jul 24, 2013, 10:15 PM
Jul 2013

Yeah, the right wing are working an angle here, you hear them lumping together the IRS issue, NSA issue, even Obamacare in a unified messaging package of government overreach. So in some ways they have the easier messaging task, those of us who believe government has a role to play in doing good thing, even really big things, have a more complex argument to make when we stand against certain government actions. But as you point out, there is a fundamental hypocrisy there, as almost all this spying is tied to powerful corporations.

But we're talking about a time when the way policies should have gone are way different from now. Just the fricking weather man... We should have had a huge effort to move to green energy. To at least design the patterns for the developing world, if not ourselves. But even if we had president Gore, I'm fairly convinced that the president can't do this. The power of Big Oil, of need of the MIC for constant war, would drain all the resources and redirect anything positive. That drain has gone to fund this giant security apparatus, which claims it needs powers way beyond the cold war to fight people with pressure cookers. But what could we have accomplished with the same money if we had moved toward peace and domestic development?

I'm not turning against President Obama, I'm just awakening to the real limitations of what POTUS can actually do in this environment.

Edit: I'm changing this post because I want to end on something positive, constructive. What you have here is this critique of federal govt. policy which the right have successfully tied to attacks on Democrats/Leftism. That tie is the biggest problem. Here's the issue: Liberalism/Leftism needs to scale. It needs to be something that can be practised in a meaningful way by individuals, small groups, a town, a company, or a the nation. It needs to stand for something separate from govt., so we're not getting blamed for policies of Bush.

PEace

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

I have ALWAYS thought the entire NSA "scandal" has been driven from the RIGHT: discredit government! DontTreadOnMe Jul 2013 #1
Total reductionism. napoleon_in_rags Jul 2013 #5
... think Jul 2013 #7
Perhaps it has escaped you that the "scandal" has a large corporate aspect, and that the rightwing struggle4progress Jul 2013 #9
The civil libertarian agenda isn't necessarily pro-corporate. napoleon_in_rags Jul 2013 #14
While I agree … 1StrongBlackMan Jul 2013 #23
You make some good points there. napoleon_in_rags Jul 2013 #26
You're saying the ACLU is funded by fascists? muriel_volestrangler Jul 2013 #30
No ... 1StrongBlackMan Jul 2013 #31
It stands for 'American Civil Liberties Union' muriel_volestrangler Jul 2013 #32
OMFG. That's rich. You Mr. Civil Libertarian defender suggest someone should delete (censor) okaawhatever Jul 2013 #33
If by 'the article', you mean the one in the OP, it's a pile of subjective crap muriel_volestrangler Jul 2013 #37
I think u missed my point, and what I see as the point of the article/editorial. I am not saying okaawhatever Jul 2013 #40
Thank you ... 1StrongBlackMan Jul 2013 #41
The corporate aspect is Booz Allen Hamilton muriel_volestrangler Jul 2013 #29
They absolutely love it. ProgressoDem Jul 2013 #2
I note that Breitbart towards the end of June published a piece by rightwinger Lee Stranahan struggle4progress Jul 2013 #3
Should I yawn before I list non libertarians who are pissed? think Jul 2013 #4
Whoosh! And right over your head it went! struggle4progress Jul 2013 #8
The NSA, the law, or this pointless headline and story? think Jul 2013 #10
"the most insidious strategy of the Koch brothers has been their ability to co-opt social liberals" struggle4progress Jul 2013 #11
and again I yawn and laugh at your juxtapose think Jul 2013 #12
Perhaps if elected Democrats made even a little JoeyT Jul 2013 #21
Now we are siding with the Koch Bros. Jeebus! nt Mojorabbit Jul 2013 #6
not "siding with" but rather "being used by" struggle4progress Jul 2013 #15
Only an idiot would believe that tripe. nt Mojorabbit Jul 2013 #17
Oh, for Christ's sake. Poli-sci 101 everybody. NuclearDem Jul 2013 #13
Libertarian Organizations R paid paths- always lead to a R vote in the end. Sunlei Jul 2013 #16
Who is Shoq? Where do you and Shoq live? Who did YOU elect? Bluenorthwest Jul 2013 #18
I live in NC, and I've worked my butt off for Dems down here for years struggle4progress Jul 2013 #25
Jesus the ignorance of some of these responses to your posting. I love it when civil libertarians okaawhatever Jul 2013 #34
You don't understand the meaning of "freedom of speech" muriel_volestrangler Jul 2013 #38
That is a couple of backflips too far cprise Jul 2013 #19
I reject all criticism of Greenwald because the right and center who engage in it Bluenorthwest Jul 2013 #20
Great article … 1StrongBlackMan Jul 2013 #22
Good comment. Thanks. nt okaawhatever Jul 2013 #35
Good article Andy823 Jul 2013 #24
According to a WSJ poll, Jamaal510 Jul 2013 #27
On other democrat websites and in the press. I don't see near the support for him. The sheer # of okaawhatever Jul 2013 #36
Aha! But what if that's what they WANT us to think? Pholus Jul 2013 #28
The surveillance issue is worth discussing, but not every discussion about it is worthwhile struggle4progress Jul 2013 #39
Very true davidpdx Jul 2013 #42
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Why Libertarian Organizat...»Reply #26