2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: Debbie Wasserman Schultz on fracking in debate with Tim Canova [View all]think
(11,641 posts)It's posted right above in the OP. Care to comment on THAT?
Medical marijuana was a big issue and she chose to be against it before suggesting she'd change her position if the people working for the issue would quit calling her out on it. Care to comment?
She chose her GOP friends over other Democrats running for the House. How cool is that! Would love to hear your response!
DWS took money from pay day lenders and was backing legislation friendly to those fuckers until she got called out on that.
And to top it off DWS resigned in disgrace from the DNC for her blatant attempts to undermine the Sanders AND Canova campaigns.
Sure. Canova may lose. But issues like these matter. And Canova isn't playing stupid games. He's being straight forward and honest. DWS will say whatever it takes and will change her position at will.
Looking forward to your comments on these issues and changes of positions by DWS.
Edit history
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):