2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: Remember the people who were saying we should be nice to Jill Stein? [View all]Gore1FL
(22,611 posts)Once again, I never said people aren't allowed to call people names. I said it is divisive and serves no benefit. I would like their votes in down-ballot races if nothing else. Calling them names and driving them off is counter productive.
Tolerance is a reason I am liberal. I think tolerance of other people's views is a good thing. Perhaps if we pracitices that, there would be more Dem voters and fewer Green party candidates.
People can vent. I can tell them that their venting is divisive and counter-productive. It's neat how that works.
I've been a member for 15 years. Calling people schoolyard names has never been a reasonable way to defend Democrats. It's neutral at best and divisive and counter-productive at worst. Logical arguments are a better choice. Civility is a much more attractive option.
You clearly care, or you wouldn't be hemorrhaging posts for multiple days that accuse me of doing and saying things that I am not doing or saying.
To repeat our president again, "we can disagree without being disagreeable." That's a good thing and something we should aspire to. I am not sure why you would disagree him or me. It's not an unreasonable position.
Edit history
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):