Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: Hillary Clinton possible vice presidential choices [View all]auntpurl
(4,311 posts)42. It's ridiculous when you think about it
because the qualifications of a person don't rely on his/her gender; however, I agree, the optics aren't quite right, not for 2016. Which is a shame. It'll be amazing when we get there, though! And we might be wrong - it could be that the person is more important than his/her gender to voters.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
65 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations

Warren wouldn't be on her short list but Mark Warner and Terry McAuliffe probably will be.
FSogol
Apr 2016
#1
Those Sanders supporters that are high jacking this thread with ridiculous posts like
Trust Buster
Apr 2016
#32
He is the current Secretary of Labor and is a civil rights attorney. Supposedly very progressive.
LonePirate
Apr 2016
#59