Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Skepticism, Science & Pseudoscience

(47,188 posts)

4. I figured this, somewhat.

Fri Sep 2, 2016, 05:37 AM

Sep 2016

I just can't help but wonder why a physics publication would publish this.

Unless the publication has the same credibility problem WND has.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

6 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

How credible is this European group? [View all] Archae Sep 2016 OP

They obviously have no idea how much prep work is involved Warpy Sep 2016 #1

It's not a European group William Seger Sep 2016 #2

Oh, for Christ's sake. I know only a tiny bit about such things, PoindexterOglethorpe Sep 2016 #3

I figured this, somewhat. Archae Sep 2016 #4

Editor apparently hoodwinked by pseudosciencey bullshit William Seger Sep 2016 #5

I think so too, just like Andrew Wakefield and his "research." Archae Sep 2016 #6