Welcome to DU!
    The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
    Join the community:
    Create a free account
    Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
    Become a Star Member
    Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
    All Forums
        Issue Forums
        Culture Forums
        Alliance Forums
        Region Forums
        Support Forums
        Help & Search
    
Christian Liberals & Progressive People of Faith
In reply to the discussion: Let me begin by stating that it is not my intent to limit or prohibit anyone's privilege to [View all]old as dirt
(1,972 posts)45. Why not?
        You can't use a double negative.
Are you using Classical Logic? If so, the double negatives just cancel.
Of course, if you are using Intuitionist Logic (such as the internal logic of a Topos, for example), putting a double negative in front of a proposition may indeed change its meaning. But you can still do it. I don't really see the problem, here.
There are infinitely many possible logics. Which one are you using, and why are double negatives not allowed in your logic?
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
  Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
						
							86 replies
							
								 = new reply since forum marked as read
							
						
      
      
					
						Highlight:
						NoneDon't highlight anything
						5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
						RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
 = new reply since forum marked as read
							
						
      
      
					
						Highlight:
						NoneDon't highlight anything
						5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
						RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
					
                    
					
                     = new reply since forum marked as read
							
						
      
      
					
						Highlight:
						NoneDon't highlight anything
						5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
						RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
 = new reply since forum marked as read
							
						
      
      
					
						Highlight:
						NoneDon't highlight anything
						5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
						RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
					
                    
					
                        Let me begin by stating that it is not my intent to limit or prohibit anyone's privilege to [View all]
							Atticus
							Mar 2022
							OP
                        
        
        My belief is that all have a right to express their faith whether in a diety or
        overleft
        Mar 2022
        #2
      
        
        And you make the same error other atheists have.  Proselytization is the urging or encouraging
        Atticus
        Mar 2022
        #6
      
        
        Except that I know anti-theists and non-religious who believe the most outrageous things.
        shrike3
        Mar 2022
        #41
      
        
        "---atheists don't need to ask it."  So, it never occurs to atheists to ask the "What is the
        Atticus
        Mar 2022
        #43
      
        
        I would normally respond with "Bless your heart!" but, I assume you don't believe in
        Atticus
        Mar 2022
        #65
      
        
        However you choose to describe it, you choose to believe something which cannot be
        Atticus
        Mar 2022
        #10
      
        
        Again, the other side of the coin:  there exists no proof of the non-existence of God.  nt
        Atticus
        Mar 2022
        #17
      
        
        It certainly is an alternative belief.  Is your problem with the "system" part?   nt
        Atticus
        Mar 2022
        #11
      
        
        As said before, you are certainly free to believe or "not believe" as you think best.  At least,
        Atticus
        Mar 2022
        #33
      
        
        Who said non-belief was the "equivalent" of belief?  Are the terms not simply the
        Atticus
        Mar 2022
        #57
      
        
        I have seldom enjoyed reading and thinking about a post as much as I enjoyed yours.
        Atticus
        Mar 2022
        #34
      
        
        Unlike some here, I have not stated my belief or lack of belief.  That is a personal decision
        Atticus
        Mar 2022
        #31