Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Knightraven

(268 posts)
2. This story is odd to follow.
Wed Mar 20, 2013, 07:33 PM
Mar 2013
The lawsuit said Hunter was trying to do research at the library but filtering software blocked access to sites about things such as Wicca, a pagan religion that worships nature and involves witchcraft.


The consent judgment lets the library to keep up its good work for its patrons and continue the fine balance of the public interest in open access to information with the library's legal obligation under the Children's Internet Protection Act.


Now I understand some pictures may be blocked due to the law, however why did they have the whole topic blocked? I understand that they did go ahead and fix the issue, yet why block the whole topic in the first place?

Then I also saw that the story said:
This is the same internet screening service provider as ninety percent of public libraries in Missouri.


Is this type of block used widely?

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Alliance Forums»Ancient Wisdom and Pagan Spirituality»Judge: Salem Library can'...»Reply #2