Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Religion
In reply to the discussion: The Guardian, Sept. 9,2010: Thank God (and Richard Dawkins) I'm no longer an 'angry atheist' [View all]trotsky
(49,533 posts)26. I never claimed otherwise. Don't be dishonest.
The OP claimed they were "mentioned favorably" here. I noted the person who did so, was banned as a disruptor.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
41 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations

The Guardian, Sept. 9,2010: Thank God (and Richard Dawkins) I'm no longer an 'angry atheist' [View all]
highplainsdem
Jan 2019
OP
That's the last step before public ads suggesting religion might not have all the answers.
Pope George Ringo II
Jan 2019
#5
So atheists need time to "catch up" and do what they condemn theists for doing?
guillaumeb
Jan 2019
#11
The arguments in the OP are from an atheist author who's been mentioned favorably here:
highplainsdem
Jan 2019
#6
I felt it was important to note, since the OP claimed the author had been "mentioned favorably."
trotsky
Jan 2019
#35
You keep suggesting I'm referring to all atheists in general when I've made it clear I'm talking
highplainsdem
Jan 2019
#9
If enough people tell you that you haven't made yourself clear as saying something.
Pope George Ringo II
Jan 2019
#13