Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Religion
In reply to the discussion: Nun receives death threats for suggesting Mary was not a virgin [View all]rug
(82,333 posts)29. It's been part of Tradition going way back.
Here's the official history and definition:
http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/07674d.htm
There may have been a strategic or political reason for declaring it dogma in 1854 (e.g., the doctrine of papal infallibility in 1870 was announced as Rome was surrounded at the end of the Risorgimento) but it has ancient roots.
Personally, I find much of Mariology to be unnecessary and overreaching.
If you really want to flip out, look up "Co-Redemptorix". A lot of conservative Catholics have been pushing this, with no success to date.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Co-Redemptrix
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
73 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations

The Guardian seems to have chosen to describe it as Mary not being a virgin, rather than Mary
braddy
Feb 2017
#6
The subtitle talks about "perpetual virginity", and calls him 'husband', not 'fiance'
muriel_volestrangler
Feb 2017
#46
You're muddling the doctrine of the Assumption with the doctrine of the Immaculate Conception.
rug
Feb 2017
#12
I have heard that the church also promotes that Mary's mother was also a virgin
Angry Dragon
Feb 2017
#11
"The fact of uncertainty, the uncertainty of facts and the cultural resonance of doubt"
rug
Feb 2017
#71
I don't believe she remained a virgin. I have no issue with people believing she did.
hrmjustin
Feb 2017
#17
"Are people really debating whether an imaginary woman from 2000 years ago got fucked or not???"
trotsky
Feb 2017
#40
Would you never read or reply to a thread about death threats about myths?
muriel_volestrangler
Feb 2017
#47