Religion
In reply to the discussion: True or false: religious people are mentally ill purely by virtue of being religious? [View all]Erich Bloodaxe BSN
(14,733 posts)Because at the time I read the OP (and still now) the word 'delusion' never shows up in it. It was a commenter who brought that up.
I would agree that delusions, whether religious or not, can result from organic pathologies. But I don't think (although I could be wrong) that the OP was claiming that his proclamation of religion as mental illness was limited to delusions.
In re the OP, btw, if you were to agree with that supposition, you would have to classify any child brought up as religious as being 'mentally ill'. Or, to expand it logically, to classify as 'mentally ill' anyone who was convinced to believe any set of incorrect or unprovable beliefs. As I mentioned above, we would have to classify 'supply-siders' as mentally ill in that case.
You can believe unlikely, untrue, unproven, or even unproveable things without being mentally ill. Heck, didn't Descartes suggest that we should believe just to be 'safe'? If we believe and we're right, we benefit. If we don't believe and we're wrong, we get punished. If we believe and we're wrong, we lose nothing. If we don't believe, and we're right, we don't gain.
I wouldn't think Descartes was mentally ill, just cynical.
Edit history
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):