Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Midnightwalk

(3,131 posts)
1. Pure speculation warning
Wed Jun 26, 2019, 08:14 PM
Jun 2019

Reading the article two possibilities are mentioned and I have a speculation on what the problem might be.

Reuters, which first reported the new issue, said during an FAA pilot simulation in which the stall-prevention system was activated, it took longer than expected to recover the aircraft.

Other sources said the problem was linked to the aircraft's computing power and whether the processor lacked enough capacity to keep up.


There were earlier reports that there were two angle of attack sensors but only one was active. I can’t recall if they were both hooked up.

I thought at the time that maybe they just didn’t get the software done to use both. I wonder if a factor was that the processor was under sized and that using both sensors pushed the processor utilization too high.

Sorry for the wild a** guess


Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Pure speculation warning Midnightwalk Jun 2019 #1
It's not a case of only one being active Major Nikon Jun 2019 #2
Did MCAS use both? Midnightwalk Jun 2019 #3
I'm no expert on the 737 or MCAS Major Nikon Jun 2019 #4
Latest Discussions»Culture Forums»Travel»Boeing suffers new 737 Ma...»Reply #1