Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Veterans

In reply to the discussion: Design As We Go Fails (Again) [View all]
 

JayhawkSD

(3,163 posts)
3. Well, yes, there's that too.
Fri Jul 26, 2013, 12:18 PM
Jul 2013

So at this point they can't do anything other than intercept drug runners, which is what we have the Coast Guard for.

Not to mention that the stupid thing breaks down on a regualr basis, that is to say, it loses its main propulsion system. I served on a diesel boat that was twenty years old at the time with its original diesels, and we never missed a movement order. Well, we did get underweigh on battery power once because none of the engines would start, but we got two engines running before the batteries went flat.

But, once the modules do get built and engines that run more reliably. how the fuck do they decide which one they should be carrying and what do they do if they encounter a situation for which they are equipped with the wrong module? Where are the spare modules kept, and how far away from this module storage spot can the ship operate if it has to keep coming back to port to reconfigure itself every time the mission changes?

This whole concept is FUBAR to the nth degree.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Veterans»Design As We Go Fails (Ag...»Reply #3