Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Gun Control & RKBA

MADem

(135,425 posts)

1. "People" have a variety of opinions on this issue.

Reply to beergood (Original post)

Sun Aug 28, 2016, 03:02 AM

Aug 2016

A few pooh-pooh-ers don't make a consensus.

The purpose of the legislation in the link is so that auto manufacturers can do some real-life testing. The manufacturers are responsible for the performance and liability issues associated with their product.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

7 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

it seems people [View all] beergood Aug 2016 OP

"People" have a variety of opinions on this issue. MADem Aug 2016 #1

People who steadfastly argue in favor of smart guns never seem to do so until smart guns become Nuclear Unicorn Aug 2016 #2

"I think they envision a smart gun technology that will allow their keepers to remotely disable all" beergood Aug 2016 #4

It goes back to the ultimate goal of most 2A regressives. ileus Aug 2016 #3

i know a guy that served beergood Aug 2016 #5

Very wise. Eleanors38 Aug 2016 #7

Smart gun: discntnt_irny_srcsm Aug 2016 #6